Is there not a process for this? One cannot just cancel someone's license for stating something that is against the acceptable narrative. We would have half the legal profession cancelled if that was the case.
So if there is a process, is there discovery? One cannot accuse someone of libel if the statement was true, So, one expects that the truth content would have to be evaluated, before randomly suspending people's licenses.
... This means that if they proceed with this sham license revoking thing, Rudy will rejoice, because finally, he can get all the evidence before a judge.
Is there not a process for this? One cannot just cancel someone's license for stating something that is against the acceptable narrative. We would have half the legal profession cancelled if that was the case.
So if there is a process, is there discovery? One cannot accuse someone of libel if the statement was true, So, one expects that the truth content would have to be evaluated, before randomly suspending people's licenses.
... This means that if they proceed with this sham license revoking thing, Rudy will rejoice, because finally, he can get all the evidence before a judge.
Drum roll....
One cannot simply delete someone from the register without a hearing, just saying. (see reason above)
There is something fishy going on. That's for sure.