The J&J is no better than the mRNA shots. The end result is the same - you make spike protein. The J&J and Astra Zeneca go directly to the nucleus. Both types are possible to permanently be transfected into the genome. And just so you know, the J&J uses adenovirus AD26 as a vector that contains the instructions for the spike protein and is grown using HEK 293 fetal kidney cell lines - which are heavily contaminated. Astra Zeneca uses monkey kidney cells. So, pick the poison. All of these injections are really bad.
Lots of Republicans out there think the J&J is somehow less bad because “it’s an old school vaccine”. Yeah, except for the part where that doesn’t matter the part where it’s made from aborted babies.
The only part of the J&J that is old school is the technology that uses a vector. Adenovirus vectors are not proven vaccine technology. While adenoviral vectors have been tested in far more people than mRNA vaccines, the technology is used in only one commercial vaccine today: a rabies vaccine used to immunize wild animals. So far, no adenoviral vector vaccines have demonstrated they can prevent disease in humans. Beyond that, J&J and Astra Zeneca are still using the same AI designed synthetic genetic protein sequence as the mRNA devices are using - only their delivery system is placing the sequencing into the cell nucleus instead of the cytoplasm. Even though the mRNA shots do not contain parts of aborted fetal cells, these cell lines were most definitely used in their development.
There is no "safer" COVID shot. They are all designed to deliver foreign AI designed protein instructions to the body that will rewrite our human genome. Also, this sequencing is copywritten. By law, both Federal and International, that gives the owner rights beyond just a normal patent. Because the intellectual property is copywritten, no one can legally examine or posses the material without permission. This is why no independent studies are being conducted on the contents - at least no studies that are willing to publicly come forward. In addition, if the human genome takes up this sequencing and incorporates it, the owner of that sequencing then has rights over it. Do you see where this is going?
The J&J is no better than the mRNA shots. The end result is the same - you make spike protein. The J&J and Astra Zeneca go directly to the nucleus. Both types are possible to permanently be transfected into the genome. And just so you know, the J&J uses adenovirus AD26 as a vector that contains the instructions for the spike protein and is grown using HEK 293 fetal kidney cell lines - which are heavily contaminated. Astra Zeneca uses monkey kidney cells. So, pick the poison. All of these injections are really bad.
Lots of Republicans out there think the J&J is somehow less bad because “it’s an old school vaccine”. Yeah, except for the part where that doesn’t matter the part where it’s made from aborted babies.
The only part of the J&J that is old school is the technology that uses a vector. Adenovirus vectors are not proven vaccine technology. While adenoviral vectors have been tested in far more people than mRNA vaccines, the technology is used in only one commercial vaccine today: a rabies vaccine used to immunize wild animals. So far, no adenoviral vector vaccines have demonstrated they can prevent disease in humans. Beyond that, J&J and Astra Zeneca are still using the same AI designed synthetic genetic protein sequence as the mRNA devices are using - only their delivery system is placing the sequencing into the cell nucleus instead of the cytoplasm. Even though the mRNA shots do not contain parts of aborted fetal cells, these cell lines were most definitely used in their development.
It's not just worse, it's evil.
There is no "safer" COVID shot. They are all designed to deliver foreign AI designed protein instructions to the body that will rewrite our human genome. Also, this sequencing is copywritten. By law, both Federal and International, that gives the owner rights beyond just a normal patent. Because the intellectual property is copywritten, no one can legally examine or posses the material without permission. This is why no independent studies are being conducted on the contents - at least no studies that are willing to publicly come forward. In addition, if the human genome takes up this sequencing and incorporates it, the owner of that sequencing then has rights over it. Do you see where this is going?
We're the Unsullied ?
bits chopped off?
Welcome to our ranks. Team Clean Blooded vs Team Smooth Brained.