Well I think it is a corrupt thing done by corrupt people in a geographical area where corrupt people have iron fisted control of everything.
They are going to have it investigated by a corrupt person who will make up some bullshit and the corrupt reporters will dutifully repeat it.
This is what it is like to live in a Banana Republic. Or a Clown World.
Although everybody wants it to be about John McAfee's dead man switch, I think it is much more likely that the building was going to need very expensive repairs, and somebody wanted to use the insurance money to make a new building instead.
It is the Silverstein model. The WTC buildings were full of asbestos. Impossibly expensive to remove it to abide by NYC regulations. Not saying this was the reason for bringing down WTC 1 & 2. That was for many reasons. But WTC 7?
He got his insurance money. And we all know that WTC 1, 2 and 7 were all destroyed with planted demolition charges, right?
Do you think they will ever come out with the actual truth of what happened with the WTC 1, 2 & 7? Talking about a wake up call for the ones still in denial. But I doubt they will let that truth come out because it may be too much for some to handle. At least not until they have proof the ones responsible for it is punished first.
Well I think it is a corrupt thing done by corrupt people in a geographical area where corrupt people have iron fisted control of everything.
They are going to have it investigated by a corrupt person who will make up some bullshit and the corrupt reporters will dutifully repeat it.
This is what it is like to live in a Banana Republic. Or a Clown World.
Although everybody wants it to be about John McAfee's dead man switch, I think it is much more likely that the building was going to need very expensive repairs, and somebody wanted to use the insurance money to make a new building instead.
It is the Silverstein model. The WTC buildings were full of asbestos. Impossibly expensive to remove it to abide by NYC regulations. Not saying this was the reason for bringing down WTC 1 & 2. That was for many reasons. But WTC 7?
He got his insurance money. And we all know that WTC 1, 2 and 7 were all destroyed with planted demolition charges, right?
https://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20070527/ISSUE01/100022003/silverstein-insurers-settle-wtc-claims
Do you think they will ever come out with the actual truth of what happened with the WTC 1, 2 & 7? Talking about a wake up call for the ones still in denial. But I doubt they will let that truth come out because it may be too much for some to handle. At least not until they have proof the ones responsible for it is punished first.