titor describes tech that is more accurate the more recent in the past you go

This suggests a many world's interpretation of QM, which I am disinclined to believe. Many World's (MWI) like the Copenhagen interpretation (CI) of quantum uncertainty are the only approved interpretations, and they are quite dogmatic about it (CI being by far the favored). I never understood why they would be so insistent and it always vexed me no end. That is until I learned about how the Cabal has been dictating our scientific discovery (or lack thereof).

I think both CI and MWI are as dogmatic as they are because they are approved Cabal dogmas.

There is one competing interpretation that gets zero love though, and is shunned by everyone, despite no evidence to support its near "conspiracy theory" status. That interpretation is Bohmian mechanics or Pilot Wave theory (PWT).

PWT is remarkably intuitive and what work has been allowed to be done on it has proven very fruitful, yet no one will look at it, and you can't really get funding to look at it.

The primary insistence that it "can't be correct" is that it is a non-local theory. But GR is also a non-local theory. People have no problem with wormhole solutions to the metric in GR so why do they hem and haw at it when QM suggests the universe has a many to many mapping (wormholes)?

So anyways, that's my argument against Titor's description. I think not looking at PWT is a Cabal manipulation and MWI is Cabal approved dogma.

Me insisting that Titor's description necessitates MWI may be incorrect, and if so then my protest drops.