My claim is that none of the machinery is listed as an ingredient in any of the vaccines.

No where in there is trust in their listed ingredients. It isn't stated nor implied. In fact I say:

Even if this machinery was in the vaccines...

Which DOES imply that I acknowledge they may be lying, but EVEN IF THEY ARE, there is even MORE machinery necessary.

And more important I go on to point out that there are much better technologies available than what they say they are using if altering our DNA was the goal.

Which means that if they are altering the DNA of the vaxxed, they are almost certainly using completely different technology which would ALSO make the argument put forth by the OP moot, since it was attempting to tie in the technology they say they are using with making us into GMOs. This is an argument, which I was pointing out, is not based on biology where they were trying to base their argument on biology.

Your assessment of what you think I said has absolutely nothing to do with anything I actually said.

As for the rest...

I have no trust in them, but knowing something about the gamut of available technologies, and knowing specifics of how the stated technologies work, I can say with fair confidence that the arguments that many claim about those things are incorrect. I am NOT suggesting I understand the intentions of the vaccine producers, only how the technologies and the biology work. I know what I WOULD DO if I wanted to turn people into GMO's and it would not have anything to do with the technology that they say they are using.

The medical community's inability to diagnose and treat the adverse effects is a good indication we have no idea what is in the injections.

I have no idea where you get this idea. The adverse effects are well understood (for the vast majority). They are of three types:

1. a direct and known consequence of the spike protein interaction with the ACE-2 receptor. I predicted that that would happen in a systematic way 6+ months ago when I first looked at the vaccine technology.
2. an autoimmune response: I also predicted this, and so did everyone else. It is what the technology is designed to do and is a huge flaw, which I protested strongly when it first came out (and still). Having designed similar technology I was very angry they would design it the way they did when it was so easy to make it more specific in its targeting, substantially reducing the potential harm from such an effect.
3. an ADE response which is related to (2) but systemic rather than cell type specific. This is the "pathogenic priming" that doctors have spoken of.

As for how to treat it, the best way is to not get the vaccine. The second best way is to protect yourself from the vaccine exactly the same as you would protect yourself from the virus: Take vitamin D, C, B's, Zn, Mg, HCQ and Ivermectin.