"For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy."
There is much good data to mine here. Thank you for bringing this to everyone's attention.
Wow! Someone took the time to create a mathematical computation for the 'if it saves just one life' mantra. Wonder how the 4 fatal or 16 serious side effects feel about that mantra now.
I’d love to see the numbers once factoring in the Harvard 1% report rate.
Especially since the vaccinated can still catch the covid so they don’t get protected out of the first category... but still a useful link thanks! Anything admitting Death rates is useful and 1 in 20,000 isnt what (most) people signed up for. Might be enough to convince someone.
From the same document:
"For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination. Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy."
There is much good data to mine here. Thank you for bringing this to everyone's attention.
I’ve got to also question how many of those “two” are healthy individuals.
Wow! Someone took the time to create a mathematical computation for the 'if it saves just one life' mantra. Wonder how the 4 fatal or 16 serious side effects feel about that mantra now.
And we're only around six months into vaccinations.
We'll have to "accept" a lot more deaths than this because, while we recover from the 'rona, the vaxes keep on giving.
Problem is we kill healthy kids to save fat old boomers.
Also we know that the data for anything vaccine related is padded from the get go to skew in favor of vaccines.
So we are most probably just simply killing, no benefits at all, just killing.
I’d love to see the numbers once factoring in the Harvard 1% report rate.
Especially since the vaccinated can still catch the covid so they don’t get protected out of the first category... but still a useful link thanks! Anything admitting Death rates is useful and 1 in 20,000 isnt what (most) people signed up for. Might be enough to convince someone.
Great find fren. Excellente redpillio materialo.
No thanks! I’ll take another round of the Covid please and then some Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine roflmao!
https://breaking911.com/new-study-finds-that-we-have-to-accept-4-fatal-16-serious-side-effects-per-100k-vaccinations-to-save-the-lives-of-2-11-individuals-per-100k-vaccinations-placing-risks-benefits-o/
Oh and don't forget that the vaccine doesn't stop you from getting it
I like that I now have data to support what I’ve been saying for a long time - the risk/reward of taking a vaccine is awful.
Let’s say you calculate it based on current variables and it’s around 1:1, or 3:1.
NOW THE THING THIS ISNT INCLUDES IN THE RISK/BENEFIT analysis is….
The unknown future consequences/risks. This alone blows the r/r out to 1:100. This will come down over time.
But wanted to make that point as there are some very smart thinkers out there who do not control for the unknowns in their risk assessment.