You "like to think." "The end isn't for everybody." What you like to think about is your opinion, unless you're backing it up with data measurable by objective reality. Your Q quote could just as well mean "us as it could mean any other thing. What if the end isn't for us because our passivity causes us to not be here? I'm not proposing a thing. I'm just pointing out the problem as I see it with making interpretations and assumptions that support your world view is that the assumptions you're making could be entirely false.

That's perfectly fine and a great many people are giving Trump a pass on this vax stuff based on their beliefs and thoughts about the big picture situation and the many other things they like about Trump. Personally, I prefer not to make assumptions based on what I would like to believe. I am just looking at things as they are now. This vaccine is more deadly and injurious than any vaccine product we have seen in the last 30 years COMBINED unless the VAERS data is compromised.

I admit openly that there is more that I don't know than that I do. I would like to know more and am open to learning new information as it becomes available to me. In the meantime, I'm not giving anyone a pass, including Donald Trump, for what appears at this moment to be deliberate wrongdoing. When I am shown based on evidence and facts, not convinced based on someone's theory or personal belief, that there was justifiable reason for any actions he took I will happily reverse position. I will not swear unconditional allegiance to anyone, ever.

I am not trying to pick a fight here. Just expressing why I am not in agreement with your position at this time. You are free to continue holding your viewpoint and I will be continuing to search.