It’s unlikely. The Photos being take with the DSLR camera was most likely for this. The cameras at each station were most likely there to ensure no funny business was going on. Auditing the auditors and keeping them in line as well.
Cameras like that, regardless of the megapixels, use a H.264, H.265, or MPEG compression. Which means it stitches photos together to make a video and reuses previous photo data in the new “photos” to save on data and bandwidth. Why that is a factor? Well because it will be extremely difficult to catch and record small words and data on the fly using such a compression. Therefore, I’d say it’s unlikely that the cameras were used as a ballot forensic tool. Rather most likely for quality control
It’s unlikely. The Photos being take with the DSLR camera was most likely for this. The cameras at each station were most likely there to ensure no funny business was going on. Auditing the auditors and keeping them in line as well.
Cameras like that, regardless of the megapixels, use a H.264, H.265, or MPEG compression. Which means it stitches photos together to make a video and reuses previous photo data in the new “photos” to save on data and bandwidth. Why that is a factor? Well because it will be extremely difficult to catch and record small words and data on the fly using such a compression. Therefore, I’d say it’s unlikely that the cameras were used as a ballot forensic tool. Rather most likely for quality control
They’re likely using other cameras for that. But the cameras your referring to (the ones up top at each station) is likely just for observing workers