Fraudit Reply ?
ℹ️ ⚔️ Information Warfare ⚔️ ℹ️
I was thinking of a way to respond to people calling the audit a fraud. Instead of arguing with them why not ask them a question that would shut them down.
" In your expert opinion how would you perform a full forensic audit of the election? "
Thoughts? Possible responses and follow ups?
It's the outsourcing of critical thinking. They don't have to think further as long as it's got the check of approval it seems.
"Are we defining (fraud, audit, forensic) the same way?" You have to find some mutual point you can work from. Starting at a definition improves clarity,, establishes a guideline, and keeps you from immediately getting embroiled in the touchy subject.
Smart! My guess is that they will reply "By contracting with an accredited audit firm that has been whetted by the election committee" or some variation of that. Basically all these committees are dem owned.
What I have seen, the mainstream always provides them with a fake narrative for every red-pill issue. Pretty much like how Snopes does it. If these people are "intellectuals" they would follow the fake news very closely and will repeat the same fake narrative.
Maybe ask them to name one accredited firm that has ever done a full forensic audit and if they can do it with more transparency.
How do you have a proper audit? It's impossible to know that one side won't try to sway it in one direction or the other. That's the nature of the voting system - it's volatile and prone human intervention. That's why you need at least two sides checking each other, ensuring that the other side is honest. That's also why the audit was called in the first place - because one side was barred from observing the other as the counting was taking place.
As for how secure the audit is? Way more secure than November, that's for sure. This one has live feed being displayed to the public. Better than when the D's were literally taping stuff to the wall so people couldn't see, or how when observers who are legally allowed to observe as per election law were only allowed to view the counting with a pair of binoculars.
Something to the effect of "If there's nothing to hide why are they fighting it so hard?"
Fraudit is another made-up word meant to control thought.
Make them watch this for details they haven't seen on the news like how it was supposed to be bipartisan and there are no guidelines already in place since this has never happened before etc https://rumble.com/virymr-az-audit-update-directly-from-senate-president-karen-fann-june-19-2021.html
NO ONE CAN ARGUE STUPID!