It is stuff like that that required Q to explicitly state:
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Q is a (apparent) truthsayer, exposing reality.
Anon's take Q drops and try to extract truth from sometimes cryptic statements.
Anon's get it wrong more often than right.
Thus, any falseness (or wrong path) an anon takes has nothing to do with Q and in no way discredits Q. All attempts to discredit Q use stupid anon's to do so, not anything Q said.
This is imo the only piece of information that is needed to discredit all those that try to discredit Q.
It is stuff like that that required Q to explicitly state:
Q is a (apparent) truthsayer, exposing reality.
Anon's take Q drops and try to extract truth from sometimes cryptic statements.
Anon's get it wrong more often than right.
Thus, any falseness (or wrong path) an anon takes has nothing to do with Q and in no way discredits Q. All attempts to discredit Q use stupid anon's to do so, not anything Q said.
This is imo the only piece of information that is needed to discredit all those that try to discredit Q.
There is Q
There is Anons
They are completely separate entities.