Serious question: What should a health provider do when encountering a patient (let’s presume a young adult male) complaining of some cognitive impairment within weeks of getting the jab?

posted 3 years ago by Excelsior 3 years ago by Excelsior +37 / -0

Any sauces would be appreciated. I read something on this forum a few days ago about Zantac. Would like to hear your thoughts.

18 comments

18 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (18)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– Huffman98 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

First and foremost, the healthcare provider should strongly advise the patient against getting any additional jabs.

Second, they ought to run tests: brain scan, blood tests, and if at all possible, get a lab to photograph the patient's blood cells under a microscope. Is there anything in the photos that shouldn't be in the blood? Does the size and shape of the blood cells look normal? Are the blood cells clotting or coagulating in a weird way?

The lab techs should pay special attention to the brain stem, which some truther doctors have highlighted as a part of the body that the vax attacks the most.

Ranitidine (the original type of Zantac - since pulled from the shelves and replaced with a different formulation) *might *help, but the evidence for that is still highly conjectural.

Based on the test results, a good doctor could probably come up with a treatment regimen that makes sense. If you don't know any honest doctors in your area, a telemedicine appointment with America's Frontline Doctors would be a better alternative.

permalink save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q