1
Excelsior 1 point ago +1 / -0

So in reading THE MOST POWERFUL AND DANGEROUS MIND CONTROL PROGRAM IN WORLD HISTORY, I'm struck by the suggestion of the author that virtually everything we learned about Christ's crucifixion was untrue.

He then writes that "We are all deeply grateful for and forever indebted to the Message of Jesus the Christ." After reading this, I'm unclear what precisely he means by this after blowing a hole in the whole concept of the Resurrection.

Also included: His current work-in-progress is: THE ANTICHRIST: You won’t believe who it really is

Click-bait?

5
Excelsior 5 points ago +5 / -0

(a strawman fallacy - David creates a caricature of an "antivaxxer" that doesn't exist, then defeats his own caricature creation - how brave. And as a comparison, I list 26 "Turbo Cancer" papers, David references only 3 of them and conveniently ignores the rest)

"basic molecular biology should have told them that mRNA in the vaccine can’t integrate into your genome"

(2022 paper by Alden et al titled "Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line" suggests otherwise, but Gorski is also conveniently ignoring the DNA contamination work of @Kevin_McKernan @DJSpeicher @JesslovesMJK @P_J_Buckhaults and others. Basic molecular biology should have told Gorski that DNA contamination CAN integrate into your genome).

Despite the best efforts of big pharma and their corrupt allies in politics, media and medical associations (and apparently Wikipedia), the truth about mRNA Induced Turbo Cancer cannot be suppressed, or hidden. It’s coming out and there is no turning back, sorry...

I see April 2024 as a watershed moment - the Turbo Cancer papers are starting to come in now fast and furiously. More case reports, more hypotheses, more evidence of mRNA Induced Turbo Cancer in the population. Many more will follow.

When you look at Pfizer’s stock chart, you see a stock in freefall. As @DowdEdward would probably agree, bad news is being “priced in” over time as insiders sell and run for the hills and Pfizer share price cuts through previous support levels like a hot knife through butter...(you don't touch a stock that spends an entire year drifting under the EMA20 on the weekly chart)

I believe that bad news is the truth about Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines causing CANCER.

The dam is breaking and make no mistake, it will take Pfizer and Moderna with it.

Meanwhile, cancer deaths in the United States are at an all time high. @EthicalSkeptic

Article Link in photo to avoid shadowban, just re-type the URL in the 1st photo at the top, into your browser to access

11
Excelsior 11 points ago +11 / -0

NEW ARTICLE: TURBO CANCER Literature is growing rapidly - 6 new COVID-19 Vaccine Turbo Cancer papers published in April 2024 - 26 total - the dam is breaking and it will take Pfizer & Moderna with it!

Pfizer & Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines cause aggressive "Turbo Cancers"...for some of us, this is now well established, but for others...

"Turbo Cancer doesn't exist in the literature - I couldn't find any papers!" - this is the nonsense I encounter daily from the heavily propagandized and brainwashed, even many MDs and PhDs who took the experimental mRNA jabs in a Walmart parking lot for a krispy kreme donut or free fries.

Well, don't look now but 6 Turbo Cancer papers have come out in the past 2 weeks, making the total ~ 26 papers (give or take).

I list and link them all (including the most recent 6 papers)

(2024 Apr, Zhang and El-Deiry) - SARS-CoV-2 spike S2 subunit inhibits p53 activation of p21(WAF1), TRAIL Death Receptor DR5 and MDM2 proteins in cancer cells

(2024 Apr, Rubio-Casillas et al) - Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer?

(2024 Apr, Gibo et al) - Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan

(2024 Apr, Abdurrahman et al) - Primary Cutaneous Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in a Rare Location With an Immune Response to a BNT162b2 Vaccine

(2024 Apr, Ueda et al) - Fetal hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with intravascular large B-cell lymphoma following coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus: an intertwined case

(2024 Apr, Gentilini et al) - A Case Report of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL)/Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LBL) Following the Second Dose of Comirnaty®: An Analysis of the Potential Pathogenic Mechanism Based on of the Existing Literature

And that's just the last 2 weeks. Do you hear that sound? That is the sound of a dam breaking...

Here is what Wikipedia tells us:

“Turbo cancer is an anti-vaccination myth centred on the idea that people vaccinated against COVID-19, especially with mRNA vaccines, are suffering from a high incidence of fast-developing cancers. The myth, spread by a number of vaccine opponents and related influencers including doctors, has no factual basis."

Wikipedia sources only 2 of the 26 Turbo Cancer papers, which is almost sad. Furthermore, it quotes a certain David Gorski @gorskon :

"David Gorski summarized the "turbo cancer" phenomenon as "the usual misinformation techniques used by antivaxxers: Citing anecdotes, wild speculation about biological mechanisms without a firm basis in biology, and conflating correlation with causation."

Dr.David Gorski, a breast cancer surgeon at Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan has written an interesting opinion piece on "Turbo Cancer" that is often used by Communist Notes, sorry I mean @CommunityNotes as a "source".

Post See new posts Conversation William Makis MD @MakisMD NEW ARTICLE: TURBO CANCER Literature is growing rapidly - 6 new COVID-19 Vaccine Turbo Cancer papers published in April 2024 - 26 total - the dam is breaking and it will take Pfizer & Moderna with it!

Pfizer & Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines cause aggressive "Turbo Cancers"...for some of us, this is now well established, but for others...

"Turbo Cancer doesn't exist in the literature - I couldn't find any papers!" - this is the nonsense I encounter daily from the heavily propagandized and brainwashed, even many MDs and PhDs who took the experimental mRNA jabs in a Walmart parking lot for a krispy kreme donut or free fries.

Well, don't look now but 6 Turbo Cancer papers have come out in the past 2 weeks, making the total ~ 26 papers (give or take).

I list and link them all (including the most recent 6 papers)

(2024 Apr, Zhang and El-Deiry) - SARS-CoV-2 spike S2 subunit inhibits p53 activation of p21(WAF1), TRAIL Death Receptor DR5 and MDM2 proteins in cancer cells

(2024 Apr, Rubio-Casillas et al) - Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer?

(2024 Apr, Gibo et al) - Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan

(2024 Apr, Abdurrahman et al) - Primary Cutaneous Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in a Rare Location With an Immune Response to a BNT162b2 Vaccine

(2024 Apr, Ueda et al) - Fetal hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with intravascular large B-cell lymphoma following coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus: an intertwined case

(2024 Apr, Gentilini et al) - A Case Report of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL)/Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LBL) Following the Second Dose of Comirnaty®: An Analysis of the Potential Pathogenic Mechanism Based on of the Existing Literature

And that's just the last 2 weeks. Do you hear that sound? That is the sound of a dam breaking...

Here is what Wikipedia tells us:

“Turbo cancer is an anti-vaccination myth centred on the idea that people vaccinated against COVID-19, especially with mRNA vaccines, are suffering from a high incidence of fast-developing cancers. The myth, spread by a number of vaccine opponents and related influencers including doctors, has no factual basis."

Wikipedia sources only 2 of the 26 Turbo Cancer papers, which is almost sad. Furthermore, it quotes a certain David Gorski @gorskon :

"David Gorski summarized the "turbo cancer" phenomenon as "the usual misinformation techniques used by antivaxxers: Citing anecdotes, wild speculation about biological mechanisms without a firm basis in biology, and conflating correlation with causation."

Dr.David Gorski, a breast cancer surgeon at Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan has written an interesting opinion piece on "Turbo Cancer" that is often used by Communist Notes, sorry I mean @CommunityNotes as a "source".

Dr.Gorski references only 3 of the 26 Turbo Cancer papers in his extremely weak opinion piece, which is full of false assumptions, fabrications, logical fallacies and of course, ad hominem attacks (a sign of strength!).

Let's look at some of Gorski's "greatest hits":

"...“turbo cancer” isn’t a thing. Oncologists don’t recognize it as a phenomenon, nor do cancer biologists, and if you search for it on PubMed, you won’t find a reference to it."

(why would average Oncologists, or cancer biologists recognize a phenomenon that Pfizer and Moderna themselves refused to conduct any tests for - when they didn't do genotoxicity or carcinogenicity studies on their experimental mRNA products, especially when doing so will cost these Oncologists their medical licenses, jobs, hospital privileges and their entire careers?)

"Basically, it’s a clever term coined by antivaxxers to scare you into thinking that COVID-19 vaccines will give you cancer, or at least greatly increase your risk of developing cancer."

(sorry David, people were scared or pressured into taking experimental mRNA products that were neither safe, nor effective. No one is scaring anyone into thinking they'll get cancer - usually they present at Stage 4 and then start asking questions you and the rest of your mRNA pushing colleagues can't answer)

"The “evidence” marshaled to support the concept consists of the usual misinformation techniques used by antivaxxers: citing anecdotes, wild speculation about biological mechanisms without a firm basis in biology"

Post See new posts Conversation William Makis MD @MakisMD NEW ARTICLE: TURBO CANCER Literature is growing rapidly - 6 new COVID-19 Vaccine Turbo Cancer papers published in April 2024 - 26 total - the dam is breaking and it will take Pfizer & Moderna with it!

Pfizer & Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines cause aggressive "Turbo Cancers"...for some of us, this is now well established, but for others...

"Turbo Cancer doesn't exist in the literature - I couldn't find any papers!" - this is the nonsense I encounter daily from the heavily propagandized and brainwashed, even many MDs and PhDs who took the experimental mRNA jabs in a Walmart parking lot for a krispy kreme donut or free fries.

Well, don't look now but 6 Turbo Cancer papers have come out in the past 2 weeks, making the total ~ 26 papers (give or take).

I list and link them all (including the most recent 6 papers)

(2024 Apr, Zhang and El-Deiry) - SARS-CoV-2 spike S2 subunit inhibits p53 activation of p21(WAF1), TRAIL Death Receptor DR5 and MDM2 proteins in cancer cells

(2024 Apr, Rubio-Casillas et al) - Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer?

(2024 Apr, Gibo et al) - Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan

(2024 Apr, Abdurrahman et al) - Primary Cutaneous Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in a Rare Location With an Immune Response to a BNT162b2 Vaccine

(2024 Apr, Ueda et al) - Fetal hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with intravascular large B-cell lymphoma following coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus: an intertwined case

(2024 Apr, Gentilini et al) - A Case Report of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL)/Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LBL) Following the Second Dose of Comirnaty®: An Analysis of the Potential Pathogenic Mechanism Based on of the Existing Literature

And that's just the last 2 weeks. Do you hear that sound? That is the sound of a dam breaking...

Here is what Wikipedia tells us:

“Turbo cancer is an anti-vaccination myth centred on the idea that people vaccinated against COVID-19, especially with mRNA vaccines, are suffering from a high incidence of fast-developing cancers. The myth, spread by a number of vaccine opponents and related influencers including doctors, has no factual basis."

Wikipedia sources only 2 of the 26 Turbo Cancer papers, which is almost sad. Furthermore, it quotes a certain David Gorski @gorskon : David Gorski summarized the "turbo cancer" phenomenon as "the usual misinformation techniques used by antivaxxers: Citing anecdotes, wild speculation about biological mechanisms without a firm basis in biology, and conflating correlation with causation."

Dr.David Gorski, a breast cancer surgeon at Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan has written an interesting opinion piece on "Turbo Cancer" that is often used by Communist Notes, sorry I mean @CommunityNotes as a "source".

Dr.Gorski references only 3 of the 26 Turbo Cancer papers in his extremely weak opinion piece, which is full of false assumptions, fabrications, logical fallacies and of course, ad hominem attacks (a sign of strength!).

Let's look at some of Gorski's "greatest hits":

"...“turbo cancer” isn’t a thing. Oncologists don’t recognize it as a phenomenon, nor do cancer biologists, and if you search for it on PubMed, you won’t find a reference to it."

(why would average Oncologists, or cancer biologists recognize a phenomenon that Pfizer and Moderna themselves refused to conduct any tests for - when they didn't do genotoxicity or carcinogenicity studies on their experimental mRNA products, especially when doing so will cost these Oncologists their medical licenses, jobs, hospital privileges and their entire careers?)

"Basically, it’s a clever term coined by antivaxxers to scare you into thinking that COVID-19 vaccines will give you cancer, or at least greatly increase your risk of developing cancer."

(sorry David, people were scared or pressured into taking experimental mRNA products that were neither safe, nor effective. No one is scaring anyone into thinking they'll get cancer - usually they present at Stage 4 and then start asking questions you and the rest of your mRNA pushing colleagues can't answer)

"The “evidence” marshaled to support the concept consists of the usual misinformation techniques used by antivaxxers: citing anecdotes, wild speculation about biological mechanisms without a firm basis in biology"

(cont.)

3
Excelsior 3 points ago +3 / -0

203 days until Novemnber 5, 2024, but who's counting?

3
Excelsior 3 points ago +3 / -0

Great dig, CO! Very informative. She looks, in the words of the late Robin Williams, Full Goose Bozo.

2
Excelsior 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even with that, I'm surprised the networks are doing this, since it will only shine a further spotlight on the Resident's deficits

4
Excelsior 4 points ago +4 / -0

Curiously, the letter reads, "General election debates have a rich tradition in our American democracy, having played a vital role in every presidential election of the past 50 years dating to 1976." Although Lyndon Johnson refused to do it in 1964 and Richard Nixon declined in 1968 and 1972, the original TV debates were held in 1960 between Kennedy and Nixon.

https://www.history.com/news/7-things-you-may-not-know-about-u-s-presidential-debates

6
Excelsior 6 points ago +6 / -0

John 3:16-21 NIV

16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. 19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20 Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. 21 But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God.

God bless

view more: Next ›