The article links to a shocking new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given covid vaccinations during their first or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.
Again, I made a post about this already, as this article shamelessly plagiarized a fraudulent article that originated the claim;
The people can't read scientific studies (shocker) and somehow were of the delusion that 827 is the sample size of the study.
It isn't. Its nearly 4000 as table 3 will inform you. Nearly 4000 pregnant women who got vaccinated during March, out of which 827 saw their pregnancy end. Needless to say, all occasions of first trimester endings were either miscarriages or presumably abortions. The actual number is 100% because failing your pregnancy is a precondition of being included in this graph if you are in the third trimester. If we however take the full sample like someone who can actually fucking read, it's 96 out of 1224, and then 31 out of 1700 or so for the second trimester who failed their pregnancy
Don't ever tell someone you "did the research". By all accounts you are a gullible idiot with zero meaningful source control, poor reading comprehension, no critical reasoning skills and a non-existent insight into statistical interpretation
You obviously cannot read. Here it is from the study:
"Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester)"
So, 3958 women enrolled, 827 actually got pregnant. Out of the 827 women, 115 had miscarriages. Is that too hard to understand?
Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or second trimesters. (You have to read the fine print below the table to see this disclosure.)
"Completed pregnancy" does not mean a woman who got pregnant, that's solely pregnancies that completed due to death of the fetus or a successful birth of a live baby.
As of March 30, 2021, the v-safe pregnancy registry call center attempted to contact 5230 persons who were vaccinated through February 28, 2021, and who identified during a v-safe survey as pregnant at or shortly after Covid-19 vaccination. Of these, 912 were unreachable, 86 declined to participate, and 274 did not meet inclusion criteria (e.g., were never pregnant, were pregnant but received vaccination more than 30 days before the last menstrual period, or did not provide enough information to determine eligibility).
If there were only 827 that actually got pregnant, how did 1132 get a dose in the first trimester, 1714 during the second trimester and 1019 during the third trimester?
" The v-safe COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry is for v-safe participants who self-identify as pregnant at the time of vaccination or shortly thereafter (within 30 days of vaccination). The registry activities are in addition to the v-safe after vaccination health check-ins that participants receive via text message. Pregnant participants in the registry will be contacted to answer questions about their pregnancy and medical history. Participants will also be asked for permission to contact their healthcare provider(s)."
Keep in mind that "shortly thereafter" simply means you can retroactively report yourself as pregnant and vaccinated, not that you aren't pregnant when in the registry. Everyone in the V-safe registry is presupposed to be pregnant. As to how many retroactively registered; it is probably the number of perinatal pregnancy candidates (about 50), so a negligible slice of the sample.
All 3958 were pregnant, which is why they had statistical data on how far every single fucking one of them was in the pregnancy. all 3958 of them. Out of these 3958, 827 had their uterus vacated during March. Ergo, when the survey was taken, 3131 candidates are still pregnant, 700+ were gifted with a child, and about 96 went tits up. The remaining 30 non-third trimester birth are presumably very early births of candidates in the late second trimester.
Please just stop, you can't research your way out of ankle deep hole let alone something that requires a statistical analysis.
Very doubtful. Mike Adams is a stud, a true patriot. He got a lot of flack when the Covid 19 first came out, thinking that it was way more deadly than it turned out to be. People labeled him as a fear monger...
And Drudge did turn, he was pissed as hell at Trump, for not defending 1st amendment rights, and allowing all the censorship...rumors are that Drudge sold out to CNN of all people.
The article links to a shocking new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given covid vaccinations during their first or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.
Again, I made a post about this already, as this article shamelessly plagiarized a fraudulent article that originated the claim;
The people can't read scientific studies (shocker) and somehow were of the delusion that 827 is the sample size of the study.
It isn't. Its nearly 4000 as table 3 will inform you. Nearly 4000 pregnant women who got vaccinated during March, out of which 827 saw their pregnancy end. Needless to say, all occasions of first trimester endings were either miscarriages or presumably abortions. The actual number is 100% because failing your pregnancy is a precondition of being included in this graph if you are in the third trimester. If we however take the full sample like someone who can actually fucking read, it's 96 out of 1224, and then 31 out of 1700 or so for the second trimester who failed their pregnancy
Don't ever tell someone you "did the research". By all accounts you are a gullible idiot with zero meaningful source control, poor reading comprehension, no critical reasoning skills and a non-existent insight into statistical interpretation
You obviously cannot read. Here it is from the study:
"Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester)"
So, 3958 women enrolled, 827 actually got pregnant. Out of the 827 women, 115 had miscarriages. Is that too hard to understand?
Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or second trimesters. (You have to read the fine print below the table to see this disclosure.)
"Completed pregnancy" does not mean a woman who got pregnant, that's solely pregnancies that completed due to death of the fetus or a successful birth of a live baby.
Here's a screenshot of the table showing characteristics of the participants: https://i.imgur.com/9lrKjmB.png
If there were only 827 that actually got pregnant, how did 1132 get a dose in the first trimester, 1714 during the second trimester and 1019 during the third trimester?
IF YOU ARE IN THE VSAFE PREGNANCY REGISTRY, THAT MEANS YOU ARE PREGNANT, you dumb cunt. Here; https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vsafepregnancyregistry.html#:~:text=The%20v%2Dsafe%20COVID%2D19%20Vaccine%20Pregnancy%20Registry%20is%20for,participants%20receive%20via%20text%20message.
" The v-safe COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry is for v-safe participants who self-identify as pregnant at the time of vaccination or shortly thereafter (within 30 days of vaccination). The registry activities are in addition to the v-safe after vaccination health check-ins that participants receive via text message. Pregnant participants in the registry will be contacted to answer questions about their pregnancy and medical history. Participants will also be asked for permission to contact their healthcare provider(s)."
Keep in mind that "shortly thereafter" simply means you can retroactively report yourself as pregnant and vaccinated, not that you aren't pregnant when in the registry. Everyone in the V-safe registry is presupposed to be pregnant. As to how many retroactively registered; it is probably the number of perinatal pregnancy candidates (about 50), so a negligible slice of the sample.
All 3958 were pregnant, which is why they had statistical data on how far every single fucking one of them was in the pregnancy. all 3958 of them. Out of these 3958, 827 had their uterus vacated during March. Ergo, when the survey was taken, 3131 candidates are still pregnant, 700+ were gifted with a child, and about 96 went tits up. The remaining 30 non-third trimester birth are presumably very early births of candidates in the late second trimester.
Please just stop, you can't research your way out of ankle deep hole let alone something that requires a statistical analysis.
Your title is not supported by the actual data.
Very doubtful. Mike Adams is a stud, a true patriot. He got a lot of flack when the Covid 19 first came out, thinking that it was way more deadly than it turned out to be. People labeled him as a fear monger...
And Drudge did turn, he was pissed as hell at Trump, for not defending 1st amendment rights, and allowing all the censorship...rumors are that Drudge sold out to CNN of all people.
Drudge turned before Trump was elected. I followed the Drudge Report since Lewinski. I quit following sometime in 2016 due to its obvious change.
Scare event is necessary?
Did deeper and u might find PP was funding it too ...
Look fat here’s the deal. We don’t let babies go to waste. We wouldn’t want them dead. Come on man! You ain’t black