We receive our understanding of the past from the accounts of historians. The problem is, how reliable are these accounts?
https://www.history.com/news/hitler-death-cause-teeth-analysis
History.com had an article in 2018 that stated: "in a new study, French scientists analyzed fragments of Adolf Hitler’s teeth to prove that he died in 1945, after taking cyanide and shooting himself in the head. The research, published in the European Journal of Internal Medicine in May 2018, seeks to end conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler’s death through scientific analysis of the dictator’s teeth and skull.
“Our study proves that Hitler died in 1945,” lead study author Philippe Charlier told AFP. “The teeth are authentic, there is no possible doubt.”
Though it’s widely established that Hitler died in his bunker in Berlin, rumors of his escape abound. Their research proves that “he did not flee to Argentina in a submarine, he is not in a hidden base in Antarctica or on the dark side of the moon,” said Charlier.
In April 2018, the English publication of the memoirs of a Russian interpreter revealed how she had been entrusted with a set of teeth in 1945, and tasked with cross-checking them against the dictator’s dental records:"
As you can see, they concluded that Hitler killed himself because A Russian Journal said his dental records matched teeth and skull they found. Case closed. Right?
Wait a minute. Didn't History.com get the memo? In 2009, DNA proved that "Hitler's bones" were of a woman! https://phys.org/news/2009-09-hitler-skull-woman-scientists.html (you can find this article many mainstream places)
My guess is that like scientists and doctors, most historians are taught to never question "settled beliefs." Even after one has been disputed completely, they will return to in without question.
What we do know, if that US Intelligence saved a lot of Nazi scientists and other officials and even brought them over to USA under Project Paperclip.
Would they not do what they could to ensure the top Nazi got a favorable exit as well?
All this proves is that Hitler was the first trans world leader
Now that would explain his non-sexual relationship with Eva Braun. And he also would have had the first recorded dyke marriage.
That leaves Q's enigmatic riddle of Merkel being Hitler's daughter to be explained.