I'm working on some Cabal History research and I'm piecing together a rough timeline of when each secret society was "incorporated" into the Satanic Cabal we know today. Masons weren't always bad. This book's intro may be an indicator of the moment in time they were infiltrated and taken over. 1827.
(www.sacred-texts.com)
Cabal History Theory
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
How is it that we know the masons were not always evil?
How do you know there were always evil? I would say that the general way things go is to start off with good intentions and then become corrupted. The bad people would want a cover that is mostly good anyway. Once a group openly says hey, we plan to plunder, rape, murder, and generally do as much damage as possible, they draw resistance. As long as they can be excused by hiding behind the virtue of others, they can flourish.
I kinda feel like you answered your own question. Secret societies don't need to be secret if they exist for good reasons.
"Hey we are doing good things over here. No we won't tell you the details"....Yep that checks out.
I was not clear then. I think every organization tends to deteriorate from its original intent and it takes constant effort to stay on mission. Clubs, schools, governments, scouts, armies, family businesses--the original strong founders get replaced with weaklings and then the opportunists get in. It is entirely believable to me that a bunch of guys would start a club to get away from the wives to drink and smoke and joke and generally put aside their routine, a grown-up version of the boy vs. girl cliques that used to be very common.
I completely agree with all of this.
I guess I was thinking any society that starts as secret, pretty much "warp speeds" this deterioration to the point of not ever truly starting as good. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Joining such a society as anything but the leader just begs to be manipulated imo.