I'm working on some Cabal History research and I'm piecing together a rough timeline of when each secret society was "incorporated" into the Satanic Cabal we know today. Masons weren't always bad. This book's intro may be an indicator of the moment in time they were infiltrated and taken over. 1827.
(www.sacred-texts.com)
Cabal History Theory
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
How is it that we know the masons were not always evil?
Well, you could start by reading the book I posted.
The compiler who wrote the intro is against the Masons but the under the pretense that any secret society could eventually harbor bad actors that use the society to form a tyranny in government.
He didn't appear to assume the Masons were at that point yet, despite them disappearing William Morgan.
I might read it but right now I am dealing with the statements in your post.
I'm not trying to be agro fren, I guess I just don't understand why anyone needs a secret society for anything good. Private? Sure.
I mean, how would anyone not in the group know they started out as good if your group is hidden/unknown?
Do we all agree they haven't been good in a LONG time? How could we possibly know the "secret society" was once good if we only have the current evil society's word on it? See where I am going here? Without transparency.....
I'm not agro either. It's just frustrating that everything you're concerned about is covered in the book's intro. Just about anyway.
Basically all you are asking is the same line of thinking this dude puts forth.
He sees no good use for the secret societies other than to be bait for bad actors to take over and use the lesser members to unwittingly do bad while abusing tradition to self-serve their own interests.
Personally, I think secret societies are useful if you are trying to overthrow a tyrannical British Empire and needed a basis of secret handshakes and cipher codes to relay important messages. Not so much use after the fact. Remind you of any Federal Agencies post WWII and the Cold War?
Kinda like unions, they all outlive their usefulness and then resolve to become the bad guy and cause problems to justify their continued existence in cleaning up the messes they resort to making -- all up until the point they just do evil shit because they can at the behest of corrupt Globalist Powers.
Ok gotcha. I might still read it. Thank you for fleshing it out more.
To your examples, I tend to prefer having "known" societies who can do some secret activities for good IF needed, but heavily regulated by non secret rules known to all members of said society. Kinda like America is supposed to be.
For distinction, by known societies, I mean with a full charter known to all who are members. My understanding of the bricks is there is very very little transparency to the majority of the members. It is a power pyramid.
We don't.
How do you know there were always evil? I would say that the general way things go is to start off with good intentions and then become corrupted. The bad people would want a cover that is mostly good anyway. Once a group openly says hey, we plan to plunder, rape, murder, and generally do as much damage as possible, they draw resistance. As long as they can be excused by hiding behind the virtue of others, they can flourish.
I kinda feel like you answered your own question. Secret societies don't need to be secret if they exist for good reasons.
"Hey we are doing good things over here. No we won't tell you the details"....Yep that checks out.
I was not clear then. I think every organization tends to deteriorate from its original intent and it takes constant effort to stay on mission. Clubs, schools, governments, scouts, armies, family businesses--the original strong founders get replaced with weaklings and then the opportunists get in. It is entirely believable to me that a bunch of guys would start a club to get away from the wives to drink and smoke and joke and generally put aside their routine, a grown-up version of the boy vs. girl cliques that used to be very common.
I completely agree with all of this.
I guess I was thinking any society that starts as secret, pretty much "warp speeds" this deterioration to the point of not ever truly starting as good. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Joining such a society as anything but the leader just begs to be manipulated imo.
Why did the early Christians hide?