To conduct the pilot, counties first created ballot manifests, which are spreadsheets identifying the organization of and numbers of cast ballots in each county. All ballots types were included, including in-person, mail-in, absentee and provisional. After the counties uploaded their manifests to the audit software, a random seed number was generated, and the audit software selected the random list of ballots to be retrieved by each county. The 63 participating counties retrieved the ballots, indicated the vote cast for the presidential contest on each ballot, and the system tallied and analyzed the results. The system results of the sample mirrored the reported presidential election results across the participating counties within a fraction of a percentage point, providing strong evidence of the accuracy of the vote count.
So they looked at a tiny subset of all the ballots, chosen by this method they swear is totally random and not subject to any tampering.
Even if that statement is true, surely an actual audit of ALL of the ballots is even better? The point will never shift - if they are confident that its true Biden won, why not embrace any and all audits?
They always seem to confuse recount with a real audit. Silly noobs. Will find out soon =)
It's some real bullshit too:
So they looked at a tiny subset of all the ballots, chosen by this method they swear is totally random and not subject to any tampering.
Even if that statement is true, surely an actual audit of ALL of the ballots is even better? The point will never shift - if they are confident that its true Biden won, why not embrace any and all audits?
A TRUE Forensic Audit audits 100% of the ballots.
Think about it.
I'll give you a moment...
If every vote counts in the election, then why wouldn't every vote count also in the Election's forensic audit?
A full forensic audit will prove if their ‘random’ is really ‘random’.
Oh, I'm sure it was 'random' but the ballots sent in were all known to be good.