That's what I use, but I have my own custom list of servers, the dnscrypt-proxy automatically checks them all for the best ping, and load balances between them, plus of course, one goes down, another one immediately takes it's place.
It also anonymizes the queries by splitting said query between 2 servers (you have to set that up manually)
it's actually not that difficult, who controls most of the datacenters? which host most of the websites..
Plus, who owns the intercontinental fiber optic cables?
At the very least they could isolate the US from other countries, and even some states from each other.
There may be a lot of redundancy locally in each place, but the main backbones through which which the information goes by is controlled by a few.
Eh, taking out DNS servers is easy to circumvent, there are thousands(or at least hundreds) of independently hosted DNS servers people could use
I don't think that would be their angle, too weak.
You should take a look at DNScrypt
here's a list of public resolvers for it
So as you can see, there's plenty.
That's what I use, but I have my own custom list of servers, the dnscrypt-proxy automatically checks them all for the best ping, and load balances between them, plus of course, one goes down, another one immediately takes it's place.
It also anonymizes the queries by splitting said query between 2 servers (you have to set that up manually)
Then there's openNIC
So yeah, might work for the low grade sheep, but I bet most of them will have someone with tech knowhow that would sort them out without much trouble.
Well, then set it up :P
Mine already is, I have the lists saved offline.