We’ve heard that when these mRNA vaccines were used on animals, the outcome was them dying from inflamed organs after they were re-exposed to garden variety corona virus. We know that these vaccines skipped human testing and we are currently in that phase right now. A lot of scientists and doctors are predicting a lot of deaths this coming flu season, mostly of the vaccinated people, whose bodies are being pathogenically primed right now from the spike proteins in these experimental vaccines. There was a recent study that came out that showed the Pfizer vaccines are over 99% graphene oxide, which is cytotoxic for humans and will cause a litany if issues ultimately causing death. I can go on. My point is, this seems to be the most important thing happening right now. They’re administering the depop shot in all places possible. Biden is talking about going door to door, very openly and non chalantly I might add. That’s terrifying. I know we say that the audits are the thing to focus on and that the McAfee, or apartment building collapse and whatever else are just distractions. But the more I learn about the vaccines, and just how deadly they are and what they’re designed to do, and the absolute havoc it’s going to cause, I can’t help but think that everything else is a distraction. This should be what we’re all focusing on and stopping. I have yet to hear a valid explanation as to why Trump seems to still support this? Is it his ego because he developed it and has a traditional view on vaccines? Everything else about Trump and the corruption and evil he’s exposed and shed light on has been spot on and am so grateful for all of that. But this one issue I’m really having trouble getting past. Could it be that all of this was done to control the awakened part of the population to keep us quelled while this death vaccine continues to be deployed while the ‘President’ is talking about ways to get it available to everyone and going door to door to provide info on it?
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Warp speed got the vax out fast so we didn’t have several years worth of lock downs before the kill shot was distributed. So in this Trump did us all a huge favor.
You have to understand, this has been planned for years, if not decades. Good ol’zignew brizinski said it best “it is now easier to kill a million people that control a million people.”
Go back to the 1960’s and 1970’s. Look for the movie called soylent green and watch it. It’s cheesy, but incredibly revealing in terms of what the smart people thought about the future. They really do think we are over populated and they really do want billions of us to die.
Now, put yourself in trump’s shoes. Yeah he is pro American, but does he see and really believe the depth of the evil? Even if he sees it, look at the flack he takes for saying something as simple as criminals come across the border and we need to have a strong border. Can you imagine how terribly discredited he would be if he claimed a cabal of demon worshipping Canaanites torture, rape and murder children in ritualistic ceremonies to harvest their blood to use as an elixir of youth?
Or saying that there is a plan to murder 95% of human population?
Some things he can say, some things he cannot because so many people are just not ready for the truth.
We know he didn’t get the vax and we know that he did get therapeutics when he caught covid. He showed us there is an alternative to the vax.
He is not a PhD and if he directly challenges the phd’s then he will lose credibility.
Trump is great, but he is one man.
We can’t expect him to do everything. If anything I think your disillusionment just points to the fact that we need more patriots to join the fray.
Trump did say he would take the slings and arrows for us, but, that wasn’t an invitation to be the only one to fight.
I just want to stop the world from killing itself
Thanks for the feedback, I appreciate your perspective and understanding of it. I’ve been obsessing over this issue the past couple days so that always seems to distort things in the short term.
This may be indicting that you need to take action. I've seen this before.
A new revelation, leads to an intense (obsessive?) research phase and then there is a choice. Action or inaction.
If there is action, then you are engaged.
If there is in-action, then a period of depression accompanied by feeling overwhelmed.
If you suppress action then all you have it time and a mind that will do nothing but torment you with facts, scenarios and ideation all centered on how royally fucked we are.
I'd suggest action. If you are engaged and swinging, you don't have time or energy to be depressed. Whatever it is that you can do to help move that ball further down the field, do it. We all benefit if you are successful and successful or not, you will avoid the depression that comes from in-action in the face of horror.
Yeah I’m in a good mind state and have already accepted that death will come to all of us eventually. For being relatively young, I think I have a mature perspective on it. I’ve been calling up pharmacies/going to pharmacies and posing as a naive ‘vaccine hesitant’ person with some questions about the vax. Then I slowly try to redpill with some phrases like ‘well I heard of this study that says’ or ‘I was looking at this VAERS site’. I’m just more concerned for the sake of humanity and despise the pure evil deviousness of it all.
Oh! hahahah. ok. Well bring video clips of vaccine victims and ask them what is happening to these people? Can that happen to you? What would be the treatment if that happened to you?
Be very sincere in your questions, you know, it's a big decision! and you want to understand all angles of it, you know, not just rush into things.
;)
President Trump needs plausible deniability going forward. He is not responsible for the problems with the injections - DS and big pharma is... but President Trump cannot be seen to have had any knowledge of those problems in advance.
Warp Speed really screwed up the DS plans for never-ending lock downs and mandatory injections. Also, given the relatively small number of adverse affects (when compared to the hundreds of millions of injections), it seems likely that most of the injections were (probably) harmless... mostly.
Maybe 4-6% of those that got injected would be lost forever? We just don't know at this point.
The rate of adverse events in these vaccinations are higher than anything I’ve seen before.
Perception is being managed though so people for the most part do not understand how much worse this vaccine is compared to previous flu shots.
It seems to be far higher than that according to Dr. Tenpenny, Cahill, and a bunch of others. It’s no so much the immediate death, but the neurodegenerative life long problems/overall shortening of life expectancies and re-exposure to coronavirus next flu season that poses the real problems. Right now, the spike protein is replicating itself through all the cells in their body basically priming their body to have an autoimmune response when they are exposed to corona virus again and it leads to a cytokines storm. At least that’s my rough understanding of just one potential way that a lot of ppl will die. I’m no doctor nor do I have any medical experience, but just from watching a lot of interviews with these doctors, that’s what I’ve gathered
The rate of adverse effects is 20 times higher than any previous injection, and the whole thing should have been shut down long ago.
As for long term health consequences - we have a lot of speculation but no proof at this point. I am hoping many injections were saline or relatively harmless... we will see.
You are not alone in asking that question. No matter how many explanations I get about the why, there always seems to be something lacking in the answer.
Can you show me the study you mentioned about Pfizer COVID vaccines are mostly graphene oxide? I can’t seem to find it through either the open access journals or the subscription-based ones. That would be a big deal and I’d be interested in the research on it.
Here’s a video on it: https://rumble.com/vjk0u1-breaking-astrazeneca-vaccine-vials-examined-by-researchers-confirm-toxic-po.html
Okay, I was able to find the study myself after seeing what they showed.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/graphene-oxide-detection-aqueous-suspension/5749529
You guys should really research this thing yourselves and see if you agree with her conclusion.
This was a report over the test of a single bottle that this lab received by courier. They specifically state in the report that they cannot trace the origins of this bottle. You can find this info near the top of the report.
It was labeled as a COVID-19 vaccine, but because they could not verify that, they did not label their study as such, only calling it an “aqueous solution”, which means, “something dissolved in water.”
When they looked at it through a microscope, they found possible traces of graphene derivatives, which may include oxidized graphene. They said they could not actually be sure of that using the tools they were using, and would not commit to that conclusion.
I could not find in the report anything about it being 99% of the substance. A trace amount is not uncommon in vaccines. I could not find anything linking this to Pfizer.
The study also shouts multiple times that this was just a microscope view of a single sample, and that no conclusions can be drawn from this study alone.
This is basically a lab report of a mystery bottle that showed up from somewhere.
You’re welcome to read through it yourself and see if I missed anything.
https://www.orwell.city/2021/07/graphene-oxide.html?m=1 I found this article on it as well. Also here is a clip of the interview I originally heard it from where she mentions the over 99% and the fact that there is some uncertainty about it being a Pfizer vaccine, although I believe it was labeled as such and there was a documented chain of custody, but possibly not very strong. At least this was the way I interpreted it. I understand this is a very recent development and could be proven to be false. https://www.bitchute.com/video/vI2Di0DhVXRF/
Wherever she is getting that information, it’s not in the report she’s citing. They specifically said they had no idea where the bottle came from and could not confirm what was in it, except that it may have had a graphene derivative in it. It makes no claims about Pfizer, the vaccine, or anything else like that.
They couldn’t even confirm that it was the vaccine, which is why they don’t call it one in the report.
People can say whatever they want in an interview. Research means looking at the data, and the data they gave us doesn’t support the claims they’re making. If they want to produce new data, then we can continue researching.
I'm hearing now that this information has been confirmed, but not sure how to verify. Have you seen anything? And thank you for your help
If Dr. Ruby wants to verify, she’s welcome to do so, but I’m responding to the ostensible proof she provided in the clip. As far as I can see based on her interview, her claim is unsupported. I am not going to go out of my way to find proof of her claims for her. That’s her responsibility.
Also, several videos here. https://www.orwell.city/
I can't help but agree with you about everything being distractions to keep focus off the depop shot... Q said we are watching a movie but I hope it's not this movie
Paragraphs are your (and your readers') friend.
Agreed, I did this from my phone and thought I at least put one in there. But I’m getting flashbacks to English class high school days.
Sorry to bring back such traumatic experiences. Guess I was in a matronly mood.