TRUMP v ZUCKERBURG
This is the BEST read of the week! Fakebook is screwed! 😂🤣
Link below...👇👇👇👇
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (78)
sorted by:
Look, Zuck is cancer fine, and he needs to be investigated for Anti-monopoly practices and a host of other things.
But in this specific case, Trump is in the wrong. You cannot force a private business to serve you if they do not want to, and the president of suing a private business for not serving you is awful. Do you really want the government or the courts forcing private business to serve people they choose not to?
There is cake shop in Portland that says different. Remember they got sued several times for not baking cakes for gay weddings. I think they are a private business.
Yes, and everyone on the right and every honest conservative was out raged by the left trying to force a private industry Who they could and could not serve.
And so they should have been. But now suddenly some people here are in favor of the government imposing it’s political will on private industry because it’s no longer about gays but affects Trump?
Free speech is in the US Constitution. I'm still looking for the part that mentions penis cakes. I get it, we don't want the government telling every private business what they can and can not do. However, the FB platform is really quite public. If Trump violated their so called standards, they have a serious amount of explaining to do as to why they allow so many terrorists groups to still post. This was a political move, not a private business decision over made up rules violations. They colluded with the Democrat Party to remove the voice of a competitor. Remember, there is also a Zuckerberg connection to the election itself.
Yes, free-speech is in the constitution. why don’t you go and read exactly what the constitution has to say about free speech. then please comment here, and be specific, on exactly where it says you can dictate the actions of a private entity, or compel a private entity to give specific individuals a voice.
I would appreciate it if you would cite the specific clause from the constitution, since you referenced it.