Does anyone know of any real arguments Q might not be real? All I seem to hear is retarded shit like "Q's predictions have never come true" from cunts who don't even know what it is
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (66)
sorted by:
Search up 53-47 Senate. Note the year. Then look up who said it first. It's been posted since 2018ish. That's one of many, but am big tired atm.
Take a look at a timeline of the Senate.
https://www.senate.gov/history/partydiv.htm
When was the last time either party had more than 55 seats? It’s been a while.
Q pointing to the top of the bell curve is not really an impressive prediction. Almost every political analyst on the planet has been accurately predicting somewhere between 45-55 and 55-45 breakdown since the 80’s.
All it means is that Q is either a news junkie who was relating someone else’s predictions, or dabbles in his own political analysis. But it’s not a skill that requires top secret credentials or a knowledge of some secret plan. It just requires someone with a television with a cable news connection.
Now, if he had predicted a 60-40 split, or a 70-30, or a 17-83, then there would definitely be something to consider. But not a prediction that involves just pointing at the top of the bell curve.