Does anyone know of any real arguments Q might not be real? All I seem to hear is retarded shit like "Q's predictions have never come true" from cunts who don't even know what it is
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (66)
sorted by:
Honest answer.
From my end, it’s not about proving that Q is not real. It’s about proving Q is real. You can’t prove a negative.
You guys believe the worst case scenario is that Q is a psyop designed to pacify you and prevent you from taking kinetic action to preserve Trump’s Presidency.
I think it’s worse.
I think Q is a nobody. Just some internet troll among the thousands who were claiming to Be Somebody Important and know The Truth.
I don’t think he’s part of any plan to pacify you. I don’t think he had any more plan than to say stuff on the internet and enjoy the attention.
I’ve been reading Q’s stuff since his first posts on 8chan, and to date, I have not seen a single post that was impossible to have been written by a 20 year old nobody. Which is the same reason I think he stopped posting. Because he really doesn’t want to be identified as a 20 year old nobody by people as passionate as you.
The single greatest thing you can do to start your Great Awakening is to unmask Q and prove that he even has the capability of accessing top secret information. If you could at the very least prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Q MUST be a high level intelligence agent or military operative, Q’s credibility might actually be enough for nonbelievers to spend time reading his stuff.
The greatest red pill will be proof that Q is who he claims to be. Without that, nothing he says matters to nonbelievers whatsoever.
Because so far, I have not seen the smoking gun post that literally could not have been written by a bored teenager, which is the primary reason that despite me being in this community longer than many of you, I am not a believer.
Certainly not denying it's not exactly out of the ordinary. But it was still called as a matter of fact with no reference to any other number like 52-48 51-49 or otherwise. But, like I said, it's one of many.
Another one, search up Barcelona on any of the sites. Don't have the post off hand. Keep in mind that it's the city where Mc Cafe was being held. I'd like to provide links but not in a position to do that rn. Either way, they're out there. Look at the bottom right portion of the screen and read that it makes reference to bIacktriangIe right next to the bigger message. Note the time this was posted and then have a gander at what Mc Cafe wears on his finger.
Again, there's more.
Search up 53-47 Senate. Note the year. Then look up who said it first. It's been posted since 2018ish. That's one of many, but am big tired atm.
Take a look at a timeline of the Senate.
https://www.senate.gov/history/partydiv.htm
When was the last time either party had more than 55 seats? It’s been a while.
Q pointing to the top of the bell curve is not really an impressive prediction. Almost every political analyst on the planet has been accurately predicting somewhere between 45-55 and 55-45 breakdown since the 80’s.
All it means is that Q is either a news junkie who was relating someone else’s predictions, or dabbles in his own political analysis. But it’s not a skill that requires top secret credentials or a knowledge of some secret plan. It just requires someone with a television with a cable news connection.
Now, if he had predicted a 60-40 split, or a 70-30, or a 17-83, then there would definitely be something to consider. But not a prediction that involves just pointing at the top of the bell curve.
The entire Q operation is a resounding success thus far. There is no more need for new posts. Q can fade away because the effort to instruct the People on how to question the Government and Press has been sufficiently achieved to the aims of the counter-insurgency. We act autonomously now, without need for the Q mentorship.
It is fair to view it all as a pacification effort, but that's not a bad thing. In fact, it is intentional.
Please read fully the following Q post and linked manual. It will address literally all your doubts into Q's authenticity.
https://qalerts.app/?n=4008
The Q operation's mission is a part of the COIN Counter Insurgency Guidelines. Emphasis on page 17 onwards, detailing the Intelligence flow (watch the water).
The goals are to enforce national pride and trust in the Government(Military), prevent domestic uprisings through the insurgents' use of divisive propaganda tactics and tribalism, secure a solid economic state, and create a team that can quickly and effectively counter disinformation read "The Information Contest" on page 21 as soon as it is spun by the Media.
The Military has chosen the population-centric approach to avoid open bloodshed as much as possible.
Trust in Legislature and Judiciaries is at an all time low, but trust in Military and police pre-Covid was at an all time high under Trump.
An insurgency REQUIRES a push back from the population to work. If they can't muster up "white supremacist" groups to support their narrative and confront ANTIFA in an all-out street war, they lose.
The Counter-Insurgency requires a passive population so the Military can act freely without shooting the people they are sworn to protect.
So what part of this Q drop is supposed to make me no longer doubt that Q is a high level government operative?
Literally everything he says in that post is rehashing the document he cited, which is publicly available.
This is a book report over something he read. I am teaching students right now who are writing exactly this type of thing.
I’m not sure how this proves what you claim. All it proves is that he likes reading government documents about warfare, which is true of 95% of GAW.
Q is literally giving you the playbook that made the operation.
Q is a small aspect of the intelligence arm of the Counter Insurgency taking place under the US Military heads' jurisdiction.
What Q is doing checks all the boxes in the COIN method of increasing faith in the government and establishing a group that is trained to quickly get on top of the Propaganda Media.
I can tell you didn't bother to read the guidelines, because Q is tracking with this section exactly:
...
The ONLY way the Military could effectively succeed in the battle for narrative control is to create a massive thinktank that could counter the Media's narrative supremacy faster than they can spin lies up. There is not enough money in the world to do that, even if they could keep the thinktank hidden and safe from spying insurgents.
Enter Q.
The Q Operation is a grass-roots/crowdsourced thinktank used to counter Propaganda narrative shifts and to disseminate the Truth and whittle apart the lies.
The only group you can target that has the abilities, tools, and wherewithal to take down the Media's Propaganda are shitposters.
Enter Anons/Autists.
The cover of anonymity on boards like 4Chan and 8kun allowed for uncontrollable passage of ideas. By recruiting this group, and giving them a literal game/puzzle to solve, Q conditioned them psychologically to find reward in taking down Propaganda lies.
Q is a Military Operation, plain and simple. The strategy has been used before, but never domestically, at least to this scale. Probable deniability is essential in protecting all parties involved, and is used extensively. That you are questioning if Q is real or not is the greatest defense Q has, and is a necessary component of the Counter Insurgency. The Government must look like they are in control, not the Counter Insurgents.
If the Media could prove 100% Q is real and that Flynn or Trump are responsible for the Operation would immediately be able to claim their victory -- being able to levy charges against Patriots under pretenses of a coup. There is a fine line between Insurgent and Counter Insurgent, and domestic fights heavily muddy those waters.
If you can't see it after reading through the guidelines and piecing it together, then guess what...
You don't have to.
The Operation is a success, Anons autonomously act to counter Propaganda as they were trained to do, Q no longer needs to post, and the People of the United States are swelling with Patriotism in a way never before seen.
Read the manual through, and you'll know. We won.
The population-centric approach has worked. The Insurgency is over. There is no way they can reverse the Patriotism and support of the Nation. They can't work fast enough to divide us. There are too many hands against them.
It's over. The DeepState is dead.
Q being a LARP is FAR TOO EFFECTIVE for it to be a guy in his basement. Had there been no Q, we would not have this swell of Patriotism and anti-Propaganda sentiment in the common population. Admit it, even if a LARP, it has been overwhelmingly positive for the fate of our Nation.
I am reading every word you say and understanding it.
But I don’t think you’re understanding me.
You’re telling me what you believe to be true, because you accept Q is who he claims to be.
What I’m asking for is proof positive, undeniable, that Q is actually this intelligence arm that you believe he is.
I understand that IF I believe Q is doing these things, then this is how I would interpret Q’s posts.
But if you’re like me and the majority of other people, you haven’t accepted yet that Q is the intelligence entity that he claims he is. So the narrative you’re delivering doesn’t make much of an impact, because you haven’t yet proven the foundation of the argument, which is that Q is who he claims to be.
Paraphrasing a publicly-available government document on counterinsurgencies isn’t proof of that.
If, say, he was paraphrasing and then leaking to us for our own verification a highly classified intelligence document that is then in some way validated by the agency he leaked it from, THAT would be evidence that Q actually has info that nobody else does.
Has anything like that happened without me noticing ?
I can’t simply accept that Q is an unverifiable agent and that the inability to verify his credentials is proof that he’s real. That’s a non-falsifiable claim. That’s a strategy that only works when discussing God, and I don’t think Q is God.
And the unique photos taken from AF1 ?
There have been multiple photos that people claimed were unique that turned out to be ripped from someone’s unknown Photobucket account. Remember George News?
It’s extremely difficult to prove uniqueness of photos on the age of the internet. There are almost certainly thousands upon thousands of photos of Trump you’ve never seen squirreled away in people’s private albums. Doesn’t mean the person who took them was anyone special.
I promise that if there are vampire pedophiles running the world and eating our children and controlling the weather and poisoning people with a vaccine, I absolutely want to know.