It's unconstitutional. Guidelines are not laws. Guidelines are recommendations. The CDC is not really a public health service, but a vaccine company owning more than 20 patents on vaccines. The origin of the CDC was in eugenics. The Greater Tuskegee Experiment is being implemented now. Read about the Tuskegee Experiment and then ask yourself why the United States was never a signatory to the Nuremberg Code. The CDC's Tuskegee Experiment provides the answer.
I tried looking up your claim that the U.S. was not a signatory to the Nuremberg Code and couldn't find anything about any signatories. Would you mind posting a link for that as well as a good direction to look into the Tuskegee Experiment?
Here's a very good article about the Covid-19 Injectoids being New Tuskegee Experiment. I call it the Greater Tuskegee Experiment.
In regards to the present lawfare of the United States and the Nuremberg Code, it is a 'mixed bag'. The Nuremberg Code is also ‘part of international common law and may be applied, in both civil and criminal cases, by state, federal and municipal courts in the United States.’ However, this is increasingly not the case. In law schools common law is taught in mere mentioning as opposed to 'Positive Law' (or 'Law Positive). The judicial system is practicing 'Law Positive' instead of common law. Federal regulations only apply to government-sponsored human research and, unlike the Nuremberg Code these regulations have been “modified” in response to political pressure. For example, 45 CFR 46.408(c) waives parental consent for the use of children as human subjects. “This waiver is usually but not always limited to minimal risk research…” More can be read at the following link:
It's unconstitutional. Guidelines are not laws. Guidelines are recommendations. The CDC is not really a public health service, but a vaccine company owning more than 20 patents on vaccines. The origin of the CDC was in eugenics. The Greater Tuskegee Experiment is being implemented now. Read about the Tuskegee Experiment and then ask yourself why the United States was never a signatory to the Nuremberg Code. The CDC's Tuskegee Experiment provides the answer.
I tried looking up your claim that the U.S. was not a signatory to the Nuremberg Code and couldn't find anything about any signatories. Would you mind posting a link for that as well as a good direction to look into the Tuskegee Experiment?
Here's a very good article about the Covid-19 Injectoids being New Tuskegee Experiment. I call it the Greater Tuskegee Experiment.
In regards to the present lawfare of the United States and the Nuremberg Code, it is a 'mixed bag'. The Nuremberg Code is also ‘part of international common law and may be applied, in both civil and criminal cases, by state, federal and municipal courts in the United States.’ However, this is increasingly not the case. In law schools common law is taught in mere mentioning as opposed to 'Positive Law' (or 'Law Positive). The judicial system is practicing 'Law Positive' instead of common law. Federal regulations only apply to government-sponsored human research and, unlike the Nuremberg Code these regulations have been “modified” in response to political pressure. For example, 45 CFR 46.408(c) waives parental consent for the use of children as human subjects. “This waiver is usually but not always limited to minimal risk research…” More can be read at the following link:
https://theduran.com/the-significance-of-the-nuremberg-code-the-universal-right-of-informed-consent-to-medical-interventions-global-research/
Good reading. Thank you!