Folks, we're all highly suspicious and skeptical of the "vaccines" for the Corona Virus. But I've seen very little discussion on what the specific endgame is if they were indeed developed for nefarious reasons as we all suspect. I'm hoping this will spur some specific discussion and critical thinking. The following is a mix of both fact and informed speculation. Apologies in advance for the length of this post, but I believe it's critically important that we start having thoughtful, intellectual conversations about the goal of this "vaccine".
What we know:
-We know that these "vaccines" were developed in an incredibly short period of time that does not allow for proper testing. Typically new drugs and vaccines take several years to hit the market. This fact alone should give all sane, critical-thinkers pause about getting this vaccine given the extremely low mortality rate for COVID 19.
-We know that the corona virus "vaccines" are classified as "experimental" by the FDA. If you are killed or permanently crippled by the injection, you have no legal recourse.
-We know that if you have no co-morbidities, you have nearly as good a chance to win the lottery than dying of COVID 19. The CDC admits that only 40k people have died from the virus with no co-morbidities. Of course, that number is likely far lower, but even with the likely inflation of that number, it's still tiny.
-We know that the younger you are, the less susceptible you are to the virus. Children are at nearly zero risk.
-However, numerous state agencies and politicians are urging young people to get vaccinated.
-The World Health Organization is now advising against giving the COVID "vaccine" to young children (for now). However, this has been largely ignored by the American propaganda machine.
-There are increasingly numerous reports of young children, especially boys having adverse cardiac reactions to the "vaccine", including death.
-We know that there's a substantial death rate from the "vaccines" based on the CDC's own VAERS data. The CDC has admitted to 6k deaths. However, there are several individuals who are pulling the VAERS data and analyzing it. They are seeing between 8-9k deaths along with exponentially larger numbers of people experiencing health issues post-vaccination.
-We have seen an unprecedented push by politicians, the agitprop media, Hollywood and professional sports to urge people to become vaccinated. Free money, beer and food for getting vaccinated. Rappers selling out and rapping about getting the jab. As diagnoses and deaths from Corona Virus drop, the push has only increased with the Resident in chief now preparing to send federal agents door to door to urge people to get vaccinated.
========================================
And there are almost certainly significant elements to the equation that I have not mentioned here.
I think it's safe to say that we all believe something nefarious is at work here. The question is one of motivation.
I have heard many people argue that this is simply a means of enriching Big Pharma. While this is a rational argument, I do not agree with it. None of these companies are short on money and I am skeptical that "the rich want to get richer" is an acceptable rationale for the world wide coordination we've seen. While I have little doubt that this is a secondary benefit, it is not the primary reason.
I have spent many hours researching and contemplating the motivations for the coordinated insanity & tyranny of the last 18 months. I have reached two possible conclusions as to the motivation:
- Increased governmental control over the populace. I can see two potential reasons/sub-theories here:
A. This is simply a very general, broad response to the Great Awakening in order to rapidly broaden the powers of the federal government over the people in a desperate bid to implement despotic rule quickly before it's too late.
B. There are control mechanisms that the Cabal needs to control in order to fend off the White Hats (for lack of a better term) that are attempting to bring them down. These mechanisms may be very subtle and not easily determined by us.
- Mass global depopulation. This is the one that scares me and it's where my mind continually goes as to the primary reason for this coordinated campaign. We have no shortage of evidence and on the record statements by the powerful that depopulation is one of their stated goals.
The question then becomes "How?". How can this "vaccine" allow for mass depopulation? While the vaccine can be initially deadly and I suspect death rates are FAR higher from it than the CDC is letting on, it's not high enough to significantly reduce the global population. I can only think of two primary mechanisms:
A. Infertility. This one is very fuzzy right now. There are doctors suggesting that infertility could be a side effect of these "vaccines", but we have very little real data right now showing that's the case. Sadly, we likely won't have substantial data to support/dismiss this theory for years as the "vaccinated" portion of the population gets older.
B. A backdoor mechanism such as ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement https://www.chop.edu/centers-programs/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-safety/antibody-dependent-enhancement-and-vaccines). This is the one that scares the hell out of me because we DO have data to support this theory from animal testing. We also had a report this past week that 4k "vaccinated" people have died from the virus which could be evidence of ADE occurring.
However, we must be careful because it's equally possible that this report is nothing more than a scare tactic being used to get people to continue to get "booster shots" of the "vaccine".
ADE is a real phenomenon that was observed during feline testing of mRNA "vaccines" for other COVID variants that affected the feline population in Asia. I am very, very concerned that this vaccine could be a back door to essentially give the cabal a kill switch for a large portion of the populace.
But again, these are only my thoughts. I believe that it is CRITICAL that people like us engage in deep discussion about the potential reasons for this vaccination push. We must not make assumptions as they prevent us from properly interpreting new data.
Apologies for such a long post. Thank you to those of you who made it this far.
I think the real end goal for the vaccines is to teach us to stand up for ourselves against the government. They need to be reminded that they serve at our pleasure, and they have no authority to infringe on our inalienable rights.
Are people dying to the vaccine? Yes. Its war, it happens. Are a lot of people dying to the vaccines? No, at least not in any numbers that would impact the population as a whole. All fears of future horrors have no basis in current data. The fears are based on speculation and fear based extrapolation.
For example: infertility. Could there be infertility issues? Yes. Is there ANY data that supports a wide spread infertility problem? None. Not a smidge. That doesn't make it not true, but without actual evidence, all people can do is speculate based on reports that there might be a problem.
Is ADE a real concern? I have seen evidence that supports an ADE response in some people, but those reports are very few. If it were going to be a real concern (substantial portion of the population) we would already know. There is more than enough virus out there. We would know. I do think it will kill people, don't get me wrong. I am fairly certain it already has, but I look at the deaths all the time, and I have only seen a few reports that support an ADE diagnosis.
I think the vaccine is part of the "necessary scare event". I think the vaccine might become mandatory, at which point we will be forced to stand up for our inalienable rights as a collective of We The People.
The shit has to hit the fan for people to wake up and take charge of their own lives; to assert our dominance over them, and not the other way around. I think the vaccines are a fundamental part of teaching the people how to do that.
On whether ADE is a concern - your characterization is correct but the fact that it hasn't showed up yet is not indicative of it not being a problem. It's unclear how long it might take to show up.
The way this shot seems to work it causes the host's system to learn a large number of different types of antibodies. The majority of the unique antibody types are non-neutralizing (meaning that they bind to the antigen but do not stop it from working and replicating). (see https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.07.21253098v2 )
The reason the shots appear to work initially is that the titers of the neutralizing antibodies are higher, even though there are more unique antibody types that are non-neutralizing.
Trouble is, the titers wane over time, not necessarily in a coordinated fashion. This could allow the balance to shift over time, and if the balance shifts to the non-neutralizing, and if a variant happens to activate more of those and exploit them, you have a big problem.
The other concern I have personally about this (and I don't think I have seen this concern voiced elsewhere so maybe it's bullshit) is that this mRNA technique generates a predictable set of antibodies, and generates antibodies that would not be, (or only rarely would be) created by a natural infection or even a more traditional vaccine that acts more like an attenuated form of the real infection. This means the "vax" population could have a predictable response to a new (engineered?) antigen that keys off those unnatural antibodies that are only present in the vax population.
That is, the vaccine rollout produces a vulnerability unique to that population, that could be exploited as if it were a binary (2 part) bio-weapon, one that primes and one that kills. It wouldn't even require collusion between the vax merchant and the person who wants to commit genocide, because it's easy to know precisely what antibodies these people will have. It's basically like a monoculture type vulnerability - the vaccine produces less diversity than the natural infection, and produces them predictably. As I understand it, china delivered the spike protein and suggested the idea of using it to pfizer et al... and they also banning use of the mRNA vax. At least that is what I recall. That's not a great sign if we really are at war with China or if things heat up.
Another thing that is an interesting signal is in the reaction to delta variant among UK vaccinated people.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/997414/Variants_of_Concern_VOC_Technical_Briefing_16.pdf
see table 4 in particular.
If you compute the Case Fatality Rate for unvaccinated, partly, and fully vaccinated, you get unvax: 0.10%, partly: .08%, fully: 0.64%. Note the CFR went up with fully vax people by 6x!
If you work out the population sizes of unvax, part and full vax, it turns out that the deaths overall in the population (which could be a measure of IFR assuming the infections are distributed evenly among the groups) are about 32% lower after the first shot, and 40% lower than unvax after the second.
This tells you a few things:
Here's my concern: does this mean there are 2 separate effects, one reducing cases (non-mild infections in some sense) and another one that is INCREASING odds of death given non-mild infection? If so and case prevention fades while the other does not, could be very bad.
All in all, I think the odds of a naturally occurring ADE situation in the next 5 years are fairly high. How deadly it ends up being, is harder to say. If someone wants to engineer depopulation, that could be a lot more deadly than a natural ADE. I think the Pharma plan is to sell boosters ad infinitum to keep those neutralizing antibodies up and provide updates for new variants. Of course it also destroys your immune system and every booster is russian roulette but it's going to be very profitable. It could be that people unrelated to Pharma have another plan.
I can't really imagine how you can really undo what this shot does, if the antibodies created are bad, you're basically permanently fucked.