Full disclosure: I'm not a scientist, biologist, entomologist or any other "ist". However, I have an engineering background and I know how to research. And I am the original "doubting Thomas".
Recently there has been much pushing of a story about graphene oxide (GO) allegedly being found in a vaccine sample. It appears to have only one source, translated from Spanish. Various claims have been made as "facts" with zero evidence offered as far as I can find.
Example for you to read so that you know what I'm referring to:
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/graphene-oxide-in-jabs-masks-and-swabs/
Some of the "facts" don't add up; for example, one story goes that the vaccine sample was diluted six times but each resultant sample contained 99% GO. Obviously, when you dilute something, it can't then contain 99% of anything because it consists principally of water. (However, if you dilute it enough, it will be 99% water!)
Other claims include the "fact" that GO "acquires magnetic properties". GO is not ferromagnetic. It's basically oxidised graphite. And no evidence is offered for this miraculous behaviour.
Their only "proof" that what they allegedly found is GO is that it "looks like" a photograph of GO.
And GO is affected "by 5G frequencies". Worth noting that, because of the oxygen content, GO is non-conductive so it can't act as an antenna. The molecules themselves might resonate but the frequency would need to be incredibly high. (I'll let the scientists/mathematicians out there calculate the actual frequency because the relevant articles don't divulge it. And the 5G spectrum is large.)
The story includes many other "facts" about GO's toxicity in the body. I've looked and I can't find any scientific studies to confirm these claims. There's one or two studies that find minor and short-lived effects on the eye, for example, but that's all.
So to me this looks as if somebody chose GO as a suitably mysterious substance and made up a scary story for reasons unknown.
For me, keeping an open mind, the jury is out until/unless a couple of independent labs test vaccine samples for the presence of GO.
Anyway, I am not telling you what to think; I'm asking you to use your discernment before helping to spread the single-source story that looks (to me) like a crafty work of fiction.
These are just my thoughts, following a couple of days exposure to these GO stories that are spreading throughout the Interweb and appearing here every day. I'm open to being proved wrong if actual scientific evidence can be produced but, for the moment, I'm filing it in the bullsh;t drawer.
Thanks for reading my musings.
I think they meant 99% purity. It was probably a translation problem.
GO can be ferromagnetic thought to be from impurities (doping) or maybe even edge effects where the empty orbitals can maybe resonate through the graphene lattice? (Just something I read in one of the abstracts as I was getting this link).
There are also MGOs which are (often) graphene oxide sheets with Fe3O4 (magnetite) nanoparticles attached to the oxidized end carbons on the graphene sheets, which display both superparamagnetism and ferromagnetism under different conditions.
Having said that, the paper I saw (here) did not show any evidence to support the claim, and most certainly not all GOs will display meaningful levels of magnetism of any type.
See my discussion of their images in the comment section here.
All molecules will heat up (vibrate) in a 5G field (or any field with a specific frequency). But saying GO is not conductive goes against a lot of evidence and a huge field of research. On the contrary, GOs of various sorts and with variant dopants and/or coprecipitates seem to be a particularly interesting field of study for exactly this purpose..
I didn't give them being antenna's any credence but then I found this.
This appears to be research on structures made out of ~200nm sized FeNi loaded rGOs. These multilayered graphene nanosheets seem to have maximal absorption on structures the order of about 1/10th the wavelength of the frequency, which, if we extend the graph on page 7 just a little bit more into the 5G range would put the size of such an antenna at sub 1mm. So 1mm long, a few hundred nm in diameter.
I don't know, its not implausible.
I am not in any way suggesting that this is in the vaccines. I do not think it is, and have seen no evidence to support that assertion, however, GOs that are of a size that are injectable could potentially self assemble and be antennas. Of course if they aren't attached to anything, being an antenna is not very useful; and such a device would require a whole lot more stuff going on than just GOs.
Completely agree. Some of the assertions have minimal support in the literature in a peripheral way, but zero actual evidential support. On the contrary, every piece of "evidence" I have seen so far has a larger support that the vaccines are exactly what they say they are.
Again, I agree. The data is inconclusive. I will always keep an open mind and look at new evidence. However, It requires discernment (and some knowledge) to separate actual evidence from fear porn (a form of disinformation to discredit those doing honest research).