The linked article is based on publicly available data. The conclusions are simple and hard to argue with (read it for yourselves you lazy bastards - do not take my word for it).
Yet, what do we see? The first batch of replies are all "nothing to see here - move along". We can't trust [fill in the blank]. We need more data. We need demographic data. We shouldn't rush to any conclusions, etc. etc.
You are seeing many of the tactics we have been warned about, right here. Non-shills, pay attention and learn from this, so you can recognize it the next time you see it again.
The other take away is that the data is starting to show that injected people are much more vulnerable to viruses than those that have not been injected, and that information cannot be allowed to spread... it must be deboonked at all costs.
The linked article is based on publicly available data. The conclusions are simple and hard to argue with (read it for yourselves you lazy bastards - do not take my word for it).
Yet, what do we see? The first batch of replies are all "nothing to see here - move along". We can't trust [fill in the blank]. We need more data. We need demographic data. We shouldn't rush to any conclusions, etc. etc.
You are seeing many of the tactics we have been warned about, right here. Non-shills, pay attention and learn from this, so you can recognize it the next time you see it again.
The other take away is that the data is starting to show that injected people are much more vulnerable to viruses than those that have not been injected, and that information cannot be allowed to spread... it must be deboonked at all costs.
We are now over the target...