And you know this? Just because it's not public or that you are not currently aware of it? As commented below there is a difference between arrested and detained. There may have been a reason to let her go. Trap her? Maybe just piss her off?
And just because it was an early post doesn't mean it wasn't disinfo. Even if it was the very first post. It may seem counterintuitive to you, but knowing everything we've learned, the first post really isn't different from any other.
You need to understand that you don't know everything. Even things you don't even realize you don't know. Then maybe you can begin to understand. “The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.”
The problem is that your cartoon strawman of the situation is indeed as ridiculous as you make it sound, and I too would agree with you that it's nonsense -- if your telling of the situation matched with reality.
There obviously exists all sorts of protocols for dealing with (insert situation) that by their nature must be done in secrecy. That they'd just publicly arrest Hillary Clinton -- with all the civic unrest that would cause -- would be a foolish move, but would they have a choice if it could be proven that she was literally an asset of a hostile foreign power?
Therefore, is your entire argument built on the idea that because we DIDN'T see something happen, it never happened, and therefore everything since is also false?
How do you account for the John McCain 30 day incident?
And you know this? Just because it's not public or that you are not currently aware of it? As commented below there is a difference between arrested and detained. There may have been a reason to let her go. Trap her? Maybe just piss her off?
And just because it was an early post doesn't mean it wasn't disinfo. Even if it was the very first post. It may seem counterintuitive to you, but knowing everything we've learned, the first post really isn't different from any other.
You need to understand that you don't know everything. Even things you don't even realize you don't know. Then maybe you can begin to understand. “The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.”
The problem is that your cartoon strawman of the situation is indeed as ridiculous as you make it sound, and I too would agree with you that it's nonsense -- if your telling of the situation matched with reality.
There obviously exists all sorts of protocols for dealing with (insert situation) that by their nature must be done in secrecy. That they'd just publicly arrest Hillary Clinton -- with all the civic unrest that would cause -- would be a foolish move, but would they have a choice if it could be proven that she was literally an asset of a hostile foreign power?
Therefore, is your entire argument built on the idea that because we DIDN'T see something happen, it never happened, and therefore everything since is also false?
How do you account for the John McCain 30 day incident?
You really believe this, don't you?
Jesus.