"Readers added context"
One of the first times I've ever disagreed with added context. Imagine driving a car that requires you to pay a subscription to use the heater. Do you want a car that just.. is a car, or do you want a car that, at the discretion of the manufacturers, is going to have rules enforced beyond your control and at their discretion? "Sorry, you ran out of minutes for the heated seats." "...but they still function, yes?" "Beep boop, you will own nothing and be happy. Hope you freeze."
In other words, you don't want to use tools that are going to artificially inhibit you for ANY reason that isn't your choice.
Imagine flying a jet fighter and then you want to use the ballistic missile system but all of sudden it tells you that doing so would be "mean."
It's like the woke AI models turning George Washington black. Do you want accurate history, or do you want someone else deciding that there's an agenda behind the lens of history? And if you complain about it, are you racist, or just demanding that there be no agenda?
Fake or not, I just remembered how much I hated hearing Obama speak with all the ehhhs and uhhhs and... AHHHHH!!!!!!!!
Sam the Eagle reminds me of John Brennan, that classic photo of Brennan making the sneering angry look
The Hebrew calendar date 9 Elul, 5785 corresponds with September 2, 2025.
That's a heck of a "typo" to make twice, then again the font looks different, so I'm guessing photoshop -- then again why would official accounts be posting a photoshop? Maybe trying to get people to notice it and get all conspiracy-theory on it and look like fools? Don't take the bait on this type of stuff
I'm not in any way condoning murdering anyone. I also think that political assassination is abdominal. However, I'm not convinced that Ted Cruz actually has any friends, not counting perhaps a few Mossad or Chinese agents.
Would the world really miss Ted Cruz? .Does there exist a propaganda machine that's powerful enough to create the required emotional response vis a vis Charlie Kirk?
The speed at which we went from "anonymous twitter poster makes a threat against Ted Cruz" to "well wait a minute, let's rationalize and imagine a world without Ted Cruz" was so immediate and abrupt it caused me to laugh out loud, like a chemical reaction of stupid.
I don't even really like the guy, but what mate?
EDIT: And to be fair, look, I get it, we're tossing ideas around and trying to look at things with a clinical and observant lens. Obviously Charlie was a superstar and probably far more popular than Ted Cruz. That doesn't mean Ted needs to be sacrificed on the altar of The Plan, as if "oh, no one's going to miss him anyway so who cares" (which that's fucking insane by the way) How about NO more assassinations, of anyone regardless of side, please?
Kirk is wearing armor and they trusted that his wannabe shooter is going to aim for the torso because most times more experienced shooters do
Lost me here. Just saying, seems far too big a gamble.
This is usually what I'd say, but I feel like something's shifted. As if the common sense of humanity is rising above anything that Big Brother might ever be able to clamp down on or simulate for their agenda pushing,like artificial consensus pushing. I dunno though, I suppose we shouldn't let our guards down at least. Won't get fooled again and all that
"Tulsi Gabbard announced that declassified intelligence files directly implicate former President Barack Obama in authorizing a covert assassination attempt on then President-elect Donald Trump."
If she announced this, then where's the announcement? <-- Key giveaway that this is fake news or LARPage.
If Trump's "why are we still talking about Epstein" comment is some kind of Art of the Deal moment, he can handle the blowback.
100%. Not only that, but he's built up so much good will with me over the past 9 years (10 in December when I actually became a Trump supporter) that I don't even mind him spending some of that good will on this obvious 5D chess move. He's still got a ton of it left with me.
Easiest way to win a court case for your client: become the opposition's lawyers and tank the case. <--- THAT'S NOT LEGAL ADVICE! THAT'S A JOKE (which is probably, in the case of Diddy, rooted in reality)
Are we sure that Google Books can't be changed to have search terms link to new items? Seems unreliable. Those posts were made many years ago, what if the results that get pulled up when giving those keywords were changed on the backend by a bad actor? Just a thought.
The left is so backed into a corner on their models of thought that they have no choice but to imagine that agents just kind of randomly showed up searching for brown people to haul off. They literally believe that, and will be more than happy to tell you that. It's so cartoonish, but this is real life to them.
Is this fake? I mean, it certainly doesn't look like it, but why are we not hearing more about this? I can't seem to find anyone else talking about it anywhere.
This. What better way to form a backchannel in plain sight? There being no proof of it would be part of the design! And it's also so comedic that a future reveal of it being true (maybe 100 years from now when they tell us about stuff like the psy-ops divisions building fake tanks and ships in WW2) would only make it that much more powerful. Okay, now I'm just daydreaming, but still -- we'll never know, and that's perhaps the point!
Showerthought: The truly good guys can afford to play as the bad guys when needed. The bad guys must always pretend to be good, and thus can't risk being seen as bad, because that would be a mask-off moment for them.
So factual you could literally write a bibliography for it. Amazing!
https://i.postimg.cc/qNJbCYpM/image.png
LMAO THESE PEOPLE ARE LUNATICS
Edit: Maybe I shouldn't laugh but at this point I think Reddit's just an entirely consensus-shaping site so these "people" aren't even actual human beings posting their actual human opinions
This makes me think about the whole Daniel Bryan situation, which is somewhat of an opposite case. Worth looking into, Daniel Bryan is an example of when the fans love someone but management actively tries to suppress that person -- to the point where the fans practically revolted and demanded they respect him, which eventually forced the WWE to make concessions and give Daniel Bryan the WWE championship, because of just how much the fans loved him (and how much he deserved it, frankly.)
While everyone knows wrestling is scripted, what made it so fascinating to me as a former wrestling fan was how the storyline clashed with real life, as it was clear Daniel Bryan was actively getting screwed over by management because of the precious "story" that management wanted to tell, a storyline which was incredibly boring that the audience was more than sick of by that point, and everyone agreed Daniel Bryan deserved a chance.
Remember when Trump pardoned the turkey Corn, but not the turkey Cob? Remember, Biden hadn't been President at that point, so.. Clinton Obama Bush? Good times!
Amazing! Right there on PDF page #42 (scanned from page 34 of the original print)
Caution, this may be fake. Extremely similar to a situation from yesterday where a cat had been given as a gift by Putin to Japan, and that cat just died.
https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/putins-peace-cat-to-japan-dies/ar-AA1vf5EB
During the drama over making McCarthy speaker, the rep on the left side went "REEEEEEEEEEE "and stormed over to basically physically attack Gaetz and had to be restrained.
I like to imagine him with a life sentence, in prison and assigned to laundry duty folding towels. For the rest of his life. It's the year 2040. With each towel, he takes it, starts to fold it, then mutters "fuck Donald Trump." And yet, MAGA has won every election since 2024. He continues folding the towels. Forever.
Just another meaningless coincidence.
You're talking to someone who normally writes this kind of stuff off as completely schizo. This one made my eyes widen so hard they could've burst out of my skull!
368k views in just 5 days. Wow!