Exactly why I've been saying there will be fuckery during the settlement process, but also an historic opportunity if you do your homework. Even though the price may be notionally in excess of $1M per share, we won't see $1M in cash per share.
All shorts must cover, and during a liquidation, that means all short positions must close. While there may be a very small percentage of shares that will be multimillions, that would represent the peak and only a few shares would be sold at that.
I think quite a few will get out, at least partially, in the thousands / tens of thousands range- which DTCC is prepared to cover in cash and securities pledged to the facility by banks and other hedge funds. Last I checked, DTCC was fully prepared to cover an average price of $15K a share.
Post that, the Fed covers, and I understand they can handle another $4T before needing to go to the well. They will most likely use this opportunity to isolate apes with lowball offers that are still eye-popping for your average office drone or minimum wage worker- and I bet most take the offer. With the proposed 50% short-term capital gains tax, HODLers could see half, while the IRS hands half to the Treasury to back new T-Bills, recycling a large portion of the payout.
Larger investors / institutional investors won't want the cash and would prefer security swaps- they will instead take MBS, CMBS, and other equities including T-Bills, putting the Treasury on the hook to pay out over time. The longs will eat the shorts and absorb all their assets.
I also stand by the theory that MOASS will occur as the market bubble pops- it's the decrease in value of the underlying securities the SHFs are using for collateral that's gonna kick this off. That means a lot of banks, HFs and institutional investors are going to be hit as well- leaving pools of assets that can either be sold off (to Black Rock et. al.?) for cash or directly swapped in settlement.
Let's not overlook the 2009-esque mortgage defaults about to hit once forbearance ends, with a lot of real estate up for grabs- banks will repeat what they did back then, but we can be in a position to own those subprimes rather than a Black Rock or Chinese billionaire. Land will always be more valuable than fiat, and a savvy investor can turn a package of MBS into a healthy monthly dividend check. (BTW, this is not just a crazy idea, either- two of my three retail brokerages have a private MBS offering that allows an individual investor to do just this.)
Honestly, I think we are going to end up with lots of multi-millionaires- on paper. I don't think any individual investor is gonna see a bank account with 50 or 100M just sitting in there. Hell, I'm guessing better than half are doing most of their trading out of an IRA or Roth, meaning the piper doesn't have to be paid for a decade or more, and the gains on paper will end up immediately recycled into the economy.
Edit.. BTW, I gave you an upvote. It's a valid question, valid concern, and the math is correct. No reason to downvote pure logic.
Edit.. BTW, I gave you an upvote. It's a valid question, valid concern, and the math is correct. No reason to downvote pure logic.
Yeah thanks man, I just have this pathological need for things to make sense. I'm not against the squeeze being squoze, I just don't understand why everyone says "$30 million floor" and "we're all going to be millionaires." I feel like that is kinda delusional. Maybe making a couple thousand per share is within the realm of possibility. Thanks for the comment write-up, gives a lot to mull over.
The only reason I give even a tiny bit of credibility to a major squeeze is because of Q's post that said "game over" which is very close to "game stop." I'm an XX holder and will be happy if I can just make enough to pay off my mortgage, LoL.
All shorts must cover
I've seen this a lot, where does this come from? I understand from a legal perspective I suppose the law says they MUST close, but who is enforcing the law? If the SEC or the Gov. have not been enforcing the law wrt naked short selling, why would they force Citadel, DTCC, or even the FED to close the positions? They could just as easily walk away from the short positions just as Citadel would have walked away from a bankrupt GME.
The common response I hear is "then the world will lose faith over the US Stock market and the gov. wouldn't want that" or something along those lines. To that I would say, the world has been deceived into believing that the flu is the most deadly disease known to mankind and that vaccines are safe. If the MSM started blasting that not enforcing SEC rules and not covering naked shorts is totally cool and justified to save the economy and it's really retail investors fault for being so greedy and manipulating the market ... most of the world would believe them!!!
Lol, gme_meltdown.
The issue I have with most of Reddit is their inability to look past the immediate thing in front of their faces and make a connection to other stuff.
Three quarters know the MSM is active propaganda but fail to question J6 or the holocough narratives, and discount Michael Burry because he's hardcore conservative. smh.
Shitadel is not acting in a vacuum. They are deeply interconnected with the market, other MMs, HFs, and depository banks. When, say, JPM is facing its own liquidity crisis, they won't hesitate to yank assets and recall loans that represent operational capital for HFs. If those assets include GME or ETFs holding GME, the cascade begins. If they're not GME directly, they reduce the latitude HFs have in hiding / moving their shorts until there's nowhere else to go.
I'm not counting on the SEC (or for that matter, any branch of government) to do shit. But the market makers will turn on each other when their existence is threatened, and Shitadel / Virtu / Point72 are not the biggest fish in the pond. Blackrock, JPM, BofA and Wells Fargo each could sell them out of existence tomorrow if they wished.
As far as the faith in the market goes, I could see that being a super legitimate concern- next up in terms of capital wealth would be the Chinese market. The Fed will step in to backstop, because by law, they have to support the DTCC as a "strategically important FMU". OTOH, "The Fed" is realistically just representation from the biggest banks out there and a couple of government perfunctories. They know they'll get hurt too, but at least it'll be shared pain- shared 50/50 by taxpayers funding the Treasury. In the end, though, it'll all be worth it to be allowed to continue doing business as they have for hundreds of years, because China won't allow that.
Exactly why I've been saying there will be fuckery during the settlement process, but also an historic opportunity if you do your homework. Even though the price may be notionally in excess of $1M per share, we won't see $1M in cash per share.
All shorts must cover, and during a liquidation, that means all short positions must close. While there may be a very small percentage of shares that will be multimillions, that would represent the peak and only a few shares would be sold at that.
I think quite a few will get out, at least partially, in the thousands / tens of thousands range- which DTCC is prepared to cover in cash and securities pledged to the facility by banks and other hedge funds. Last I checked, DTCC was fully prepared to cover an average price of $15K a share.
Post that, the Fed covers, and I understand they can handle another $4T before needing to go to the well. They will most likely use this opportunity to isolate apes with lowball offers that are still eye-popping for your average office drone or minimum wage worker- and I bet most take the offer. With the proposed 50% short-term capital gains tax, HODLers could see half, while the IRS hands half to the Treasury to back new T-Bills, recycling a large portion of the payout.
Larger investors / institutional investors won't want the cash and would prefer security swaps- they will instead take MBS, CMBS, and other equities including T-Bills, putting the Treasury on the hook to pay out over time. The longs will eat the shorts and absorb all their assets.
I also stand by the theory that MOASS will occur as the market bubble pops- it's the decrease in value of the underlying securities the SHFs are using for collateral that's gonna kick this off. That means a lot of banks, HFs and institutional investors are going to be hit as well- leaving pools of assets that can either be sold off (to Black Rock et. al.?) for cash or directly swapped in settlement.
Let's not overlook the 2009-esque mortgage defaults about to hit once forbearance ends, with a lot of real estate up for grabs- banks will repeat what they did back then, but we can be in a position to own those subprimes rather than a Black Rock or Chinese billionaire. Land will always be more valuable than fiat, and a savvy investor can turn a package of MBS into a healthy monthly dividend check. (BTW, this is not just a crazy idea, either- two of my three retail brokerages have a private MBS offering that allows an individual investor to do just this.)
Honestly, I think we are going to end up with lots of multi-millionaires- on paper. I don't think any individual investor is gonna see a bank account with 50 or 100M just sitting in there. Hell, I'm guessing better than half are doing most of their trading out of an IRA or Roth, meaning the piper doesn't have to be paid for a decade or more, and the gains on paper will end up immediately recycled into the economy.
Edit.. BTW, I gave you an upvote. It's a valid question, valid concern, and the math is correct. No reason to downvote pure logic.
Yeah thanks man, I just have this pathological need for things to make sense. I'm not against the squeeze being squoze, I just don't understand why everyone says "$30 million floor" and "we're all going to be millionaires." I feel like that is kinda delusional. Maybe making a couple thousand per share is within the realm of possibility. Thanks for the comment write-up, gives a lot to mull over.
The only reason I give even a tiny bit of credibility to a major squeeze is because of Q's post that said "game over" which is very close to "game stop." I'm an XX holder and will be happy if I can just make enough to pay off my mortgage, LoL.
I've seen this a lot, where does this come from? I understand from a legal perspective I suppose the law says they MUST close, but who is enforcing the law? If the SEC or the Gov. have not been enforcing the law wrt naked short selling, why would they force Citadel, DTCC, or even the FED to close the positions? They could just as easily walk away from the short positions just as Citadel would have walked away from a bankrupt GME.
The common response I hear is "then the world will lose faith over the US Stock market and the gov. wouldn't want that" or something along those lines. To that I would say, the world has been deceived into believing that the flu is the most deadly disease known to mankind and that vaccines are safe. If the MSM started blasting that not enforcing SEC rules and not covering naked shorts is totally cool and justified to save the economy and it's really retail investors fault for being so greedy and manipulating the market ... most of the world would believe them!!!
I thought this was a really good point: https://www.reddit.com/r/gme_meltdown/comments/ojbmw0/the_ultimate_and_yet_simplest_counter_point_for_a/
Lol, gme_meltdown. The issue I have with most of Reddit is their inability to look past the immediate thing in front of their faces and make a connection to other stuff. Three quarters know the MSM is active propaganda but fail to question J6 or the holocough narratives, and discount Michael Burry because he's hardcore conservative. smh.
Shitadel is not acting in a vacuum. They are deeply interconnected with the market, other MMs, HFs, and depository banks. When, say, JPM is facing its own liquidity crisis, they won't hesitate to yank assets and recall loans that represent operational capital for HFs. If those assets include GME or ETFs holding GME, the cascade begins. If they're not GME directly, they reduce the latitude HFs have in hiding / moving their shorts until there's nowhere else to go.
I'm not counting on the SEC (or for that matter, any branch of government) to do shit. But the market makers will turn on each other when their existence is threatened, and Shitadel / Virtu / Point72 are not the biggest fish in the pond. Blackrock, JPM, BofA and Wells Fargo each could sell them out of existence tomorrow if they wished.
As far as the faith in the market goes, I could see that being a super legitimate concern- next up in terms of capital wealth would be the Chinese market. The Fed will step in to backstop, because by law, they have to support the DTCC as a "strategically important FMU". OTOH, "The Fed" is realistically just representation from the biggest banks out there and a couple of government perfunctories. They know they'll get hurt too, but at least it'll be shared pain- shared 50/50 by taxpayers funding the Treasury. In the end, though, it'll all be worth it to be allowed to continue doing business as they have for hundreds of years, because China won't allow that.