Project Mockingbird in full effect.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
Well, let’s think it out for a second.
He is, or recently was since 2012, a full-time professor at Shanghai Jiao Tong University in China.
https://www.ae-info.org/ae/Member/Montagnier_Luc
Want to take a guess how higher education is funded in Communist China?
So if we think this out a little further....
Anyone with financial ties to China should be considered suspect?
Do I understand your logic correctly?
Originally I said that wouldn’t be an unreasonable position, but the truth is that it’s not my call to make. I can’t tell you what should make you suspicious.
Whether that source of funding actually bothers you is up to you. Some of you didn’t know he worked for China. I did the research and showed you. You can do what you will with that info.
At the very least, it bothers me a bit, and I’m not even on the Q train. China has a tendency to soak up questionable individuals in science.
My opposition to this individual is for a different reason, and I don’t trust people just because they have a Nobel. They gave the guy who invented lobotomies a Nobel, and that’s one of the most horrific procedures you can perform on a human being. His credibility is pretty low with me.
No....you told everyone he worked for China. Then when asked for why you made the claim, you showed your research link.
Probably best to include such a link from the start, since anyone can make claims on the internet.
I’m on a site full of researchers. I’m not the only one that needs to put in my legwork.
“Trust, but verify” is far less useful than, “verify, then trust.” That way you don’t get caught off-guard by easily-researchable info after-the-fact.