Q's last post of substance was just & only: Durham
Yet whenever Trump talks he says "where is Durham" and changes the subject to Horowitz. Do you think this is his clever way of hiding / protecting Durham so that he can continue his investigation or do you think something went wrong there Trump seems upset with Barr who hired Durham but he doesn't totally trash Barr either. He just said he succumbed to pressure
What's your take on Durham?. Not the man, the work he was doing. Do you have reason to believe it's still going on & that something will be brought forth?
Interesting! Good point! hmmm So is it that Barr (& hence Garland) couldn't (can't) fire???
Sessions brought Durham on, but Barr was the one who appointed Durham as special council, thereby insulating him.
So by insulating him, did Barr make him less powerful or less vulnerable? All I want to know is if Durham can be fired. I know Archibald Cox was a special council & he was fired.by Nixon but maybe this is different.