Many think there should be a second election once the fraud is revealed. I disagree on the 2nd election. Trump won, US Space Force, the Military and DNI report has the fraud/steal data-metadata and NSA has all the cell phone data of these that were involved. (I'm certain Rudy Guilliani is working 24/7 on the HUGE and massive RICO case!) They know TRUMP won, We, The People know he won and with the audit(s) will prove he won and that Joe Biden cheated.
Biden forfeits his win and the presidency with fraud in just one state. His presidency and all, ALL those electoral votes he received is all null and void. Not just swing state votes, but all the states he supposedly won, he forfeits. 'FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING' as written in the Constitution. That's why he hot-tailed it to PA yesterday in panic-mode! Will he go to GA, MI, WI, NV and NH as well to make similar speeches? I wouldn't doubt it! Watch what happens next with GA & PA running a race to be 2nd to audit!
The Audits (just one states' audit) will prove US Space Force, Military investigation and DNI report to be accurate regarding the fraud.
Remember this; a lawyer does not ask a question he does not already know the answer to. Same scenario here, Trump already knows the answer to the election fraud/steal. He's just waiting on the audit results so that he is distanced himself from the process. A process that allows The People to actually put into motion these audits and hence reveal the true results of the audits, of which, Trump already knows the answer to. He had to step down from the presidency so that he would not look like a tyrannical political figure.
TRUMP IS IN THE PROCESS OF PLAYING HIS CARD(S). He has steered We, The People in this very direction...
On a second election? Why would we ever give a cheater a 2nd chance? Election fraud is a treasonous felony offense, punishable by DEATH! There are no 'do-overs', here!!! Fool me once, fool me twice? A criminal, is a criminal, is a criminal, PERIOD!!
I understand where you're coming from, but how does the narrative that the majority of fraud was due to hacking of the machines change with a second election using the same machines?
Good point! But who says they are going to use hacking as the method of fraud in the public narrative?
That's too complicated. Plus Hillary already poisoned that well, and facts don't matter.
The fraud is going to be proven physically. In a way it will be near impossible to argue against without looking like a "conspiracy theorist"
I'm thinking they will focus on the ballots received vs votes tallied. It seems like it's the hardest to argue.
If 2 million people voted and we have 3 million ballots we need to redo. Not complicated.
"2.1 million voted" and we have ( guessing) 1.5 million ballots, you mean.
I thought it was the other way? More ballots than registered voters.
Either way they lose. If less ballots, they made up a machine total and certified it, thinking no one would ever count 2 million ballots. If more ballots, it will be shown that there are invalid ones, because we already know about some. I'm going with less because of a remark weeks ago that "we have counted x many ballots and at our rate of 100,000/day, we will be done by June 24." Some here calculated that rate on top of known total would come far short of 2.1 million. So did the audit spokesman misspeak? We will soon know.