Encryption keys can be shared. Streams can be mirrored. Data is never secure. Just ask Hollywood. They can never take down all of the pirated video content that is out there.
This technology is abusable. It will put students and teachers alike in great danger of doxing and harassment, and subject them to unwarranted and unreasonable risk. Nobody should be subjected to such working conditions. School is not meant to be televised.
You are right.I think you are obviously right. However to prove this I had to play devil's advocate. Simply.
Data is never secure
Data is only "secure" against certain dangers it is secured against - not higher ones. So you are right in general sense as "absolutely secure" is in practice impossible. Every sysadmin (if would be honest) would say that.
What I had proven there - all we could do with this model is improving security level and thus decreasing availability of stealing data. But you gave good example with hollywood. It means costs,and complicating life.
Encryption keys can be shared. Streams can be mirrored. Data is never secure. Just ask Hollywood. They can never take down all of the pirated video content that is out there.
This technology is abusable. It will put students and teachers alike in great danger of doxing and harassment, and subject them to unwarranted and unreasonable risk. Nobody should be subjected to such working conditions. School is not meant to be televised.
You are right.I think you are obviously right. However to prove this I had to play devil's advocate. Simply.
Data is only "secure" against certain dangers it is secured against - not higher ones. So you are right in general sense as "absolutely secure" is in practice impossible. Every sysadmin (if would be honest) would say that.
What I had proven there - all we could do with this model is improving security level and thus decreasing availability of stealing data. But you gave good example with hollywood. It means costs,and complicating life.