This article was badly done, surprised this one got put out without any quality checks by the Gateway Pundit. The video gives hardly any information. So, from my understanding, the sharpies prove that there were fraudulent ballots? I thought the purpose of fraudulent ballots was to pack the numbers for Joe and the Democrats?
In the hearing today, they showed how the non-authorized ballot paper was too thin and the sharpie ink blead through. This creates an error and thus a reason for a human to adjudicate the ballot, i.e. slide the vote from Trump to Biden. Of course, the ballot was designed so that if a bleed through occurred it could create a double vote and the adjudicator could choose which candidate the voter intended to vote for. That is my recollection at least. Could be misremembering a bit.
This article was badly done, surprised this one got put out without any quality checks by the Gateway Pundit. The video gives hardly any information. So, from my understanding, the sharpies prove that there were fraudulent ballots? I thought the purpose of fraudulent ballots was to pack the numbers for Joe and the Democrats?
In the hearing today, they showed how the non-authorized ballot paper was too thin and the sharpie ink blead through. This creates an error and thus a reason for a human to adjudicate the ballot, i.e. slide the vote from Trump to Biden. Of course, the ballot was designed so that if a bleed through occurred it could create a double vote and the adjudicator could choose which candidate the voter intended to vote for. That is my recollection at least. Could be misremembering a bit.
We'll need more information on this, or at least ask the person who found this some questions to clarify this better.