That kind of logic doesn't get through to the types of people who were g r 0 0 m e d to think they could never do wrong, though. To them, any form of corruption on their side is too tinfoil. I also don't think it's semantics. It's apples and oranges, or rather apples and eggs. Audits include actuaIforensics whereas recounts don't. If audits were lnvestig ations, recounts would be reading the poIicereport. It shouldn't be treated as one in the same.
The funniest part is that they specifically chose independents to do the work. It's not like we enjoy Republicans over here, which is my litmus test for bias. I may be conservative (technically a classical liberal, but these terms mean nothing to the politically illiterate) but I'm not foolish enough to believe it's team A vs team B. It's the people vs corruption. It always has been. Ideology takes a backseat because, as I see it, it's ultimately about collectivists for the individual vs individualists for the collective.
That kind of logic doesn't get through to the types of people who were g r 0 0 m e d to think they could never do wrong, though. To them, any form of corruption on their side is too tinfoil. I also don't think it's semantics. It's apples and oranges, or rather apples and eggs. Audits include actuaIforensics whereas recounts don't. If audits were lnvestig ations, recounts would be reading the poIicereport. It shouldn't be treated as one in the same.
The funniest part is that they specifically chose independents to do the work. It's not like we enjoy Republicans over here, which is my litmus test for bias. I may be conservative (technically a classical liberal, but these terms mean nothing to the politically illiterate) but I'm not foolish enough to believe it's team A vs team B. It's the people vs corruption. It always has been. Ideology takes a backseat because, as I see it, it's ultimately about collectivists for the individual vs individualists for the collective.