You're showing me a screengrab for what 8kun is RIGHT NOW. Which shows a heavy research sub. Why? Because that's where Q used to post. Of course it's a big sub now.
But did it look that way to Q when he was searching for a site to recruit followers? Not to my recollection, no. I'm sure the research sub was there, but like I said, there were hundreds of chans out there, and 8chan was notable specifically for being one that was less regulated than... 4chan...
That was my point. If the research sub wasn't a big deal when Q first made his post, and only LATER became a big deal because Q was posting there, it still means he chose a site notorious ONLY (at the time) for child porn. There were passwords and similar stuff on 4chan. All the same tools, less of the CP.
See the problem? So can you get stats for 8chan from 2016 and see if your theory holds?
I really don't. My honest take on the Deep State is that it's a term used by Donald Trump to avoid taking personal responsibility for his failures and incompetencies.
Obviously, that's not a popular take around here, but my problems with the Q theories go WAY further than simply not trusting Q. It's not trusting Q, because I don't trust that Trump actually had the enemy he claimed to have in the first place.
I am done posting for the night, and I'll take a look at what you wrote, but it's worth thinking on the fact that most non-Q people don't accept even the most fundamental parts of what you have to believe before you get anywhere near Q.
We don't accept that there is a Deep State the way Trump claims there to be. We accept that there are high-profile rich pedophiles, but that Trump has literally nothing to do with leading some secret war against them. That stuff has not been established for us, but it's taken as absolute fundamental truth here.
You're going to have a real hard time Awakening normies unless you start proving the very bones of your theories first.
Thank you for the archive link. I will take a look for the data I want later.
No, you missed why I asked.
You're showing me a screengrab for what 8kun is RIGHT NOW. Which shows a heavy research sub. Why? Because that's where Q used to post. Of course it's a big sub now.
But did it look that way to Q when he was searching for a site to recruit followers? Not to my recollection, no. I'm sure the research sub was there, but like I said, there were hundreds of chans out there, and 8chan was notable specifically for being one that was less regulated than... 4chan...
That was my point. If the research sub wasn't a big deal when Q first made his post, and only LATER became a big deal because Q was posting there, it still means he chose a site notorious ONLY (at the time) for child porn. There were passwords and similar stuff on 4chan. All the same tools, less of the CP.
See the problem? So can you get stats for 8chan from 2016 and see if your theory holds?
I really don't. My honest take on the Deep State is that it's a term used by Donald Trump to avoid taking personal responsibility for his failures and incompetencies.
Obviously, that's not a popular take around here, but my problems with the Q theories go WAY further than simply not trusting Q. It's not trusting Q, because I don't trust that Trump actually had the enemy he claimed to have in the first place.
I am done posting for the night, and I'll take a look at what you wrote, but it's worth thinking on the fact that most non-Q people don't accept even the most fundamental parts of what you have to believe before you get anywhere near Q.
We don't accept that there is a Deep State the way Trump claims there to be. We accept that there are high-profile rich pedophiles, but that Trump has literally nothing to do with leading some secret war against them. That stuff has not been established for us, but it's taken as absolute fundamental truth here.
You're going to have a real hard time Awakening normies unless you start proving the very bones of your theories first.
Thank you for the archive link. I will take a look for the data I want later.