Allright, so I know some pretty intelligent/perceptive men, for privacy reasons, I cannot disclose.
Here's the rub, my "friends" seems to think that McAffee is/was Q. (I KNOW, more than 1 individual.) Mentioned something about him operating off of some "boat/ship" and since McAffee was epsteined, they told me with utmost confidence that Q is dead. Personally, I didnt buy it. Have any of ya'll heard anything in the ballpark of such claims? As I respect the individuals highly, no insults from me. I only wonder, how would one come to such a conclusion?
What do ya'll think? Been racking my brain to avail. Thanks for playing. Peace and Grace frens.
If we assume Q is a truthsayer, Q is not a person but a group. More importantly its a movement, with many people involved. If you took out a member of Q, even if it was the primary poster of Q drops, there would be someone to take their place. With the beginning assumption, Q can not be killed without taking out the entire group.
No one knows how large that group is. The "know it alls" are, according to our assumed truthsayer, less than 10 people. But how many are one level below that, say, the "know it mostly's". Probably quite a few. Below that, the "know some of it's"? Probably a lot. If you get all the "know some of it's" together you could probably recreate Q without too much difficulty.
You can't kill Q without killing a whole mess of people. Your friend has no basis for this line of reasoning. Without a solid basis the only logical conclusion is that your friend is incorrect.