I mostly understood what you were trying to say. The theorist in me though, wishes to know if you are using an autocomplete tech that helps you to complete your sentences. such as featured on many phones.
Nope, on a computer. People are usually around and talking to me about other things when I type. But mostly, it's just the way I communicate.
BTW - I'm against executions for the most part. These people are horrors walking on earth, but they were raised by other horrors and never stood a chance. As long as they can be permanently removed from decent humans and the innocent, there is no need for blood. If blood is required, then so be it.
Every psycho with even fleeting knowledge of this horrific crime against children should never again see the light of day.
So we are prosecuting the possession of knowledge, and not the criminal actions of people involved?
I am highly concerned with the thought process that formed that sentence.
No, I mean everyone who facilitated this atrocity. Down to the paper pushers with knowledge of the crime.
I mostly understood what you were trying to say. The theorist in me though, wishes to know if you are using an autocomplete tech that helps you to complete your sentences. such as featured on many phones.
Nope, on a computer. People are usually around and talking to me about other things when I type. But mostly, it's just the way I communicate.
BTW - I'm against executions for the most part. These people are horrors walking on earth, but they were raised by other horrors and never stood a chance. As long as they can be permanently removed from decent humans and the innocent, there is no need for blood. If blood is required, then so be it.