Why doesn’t someone point out the simple truth: unless “fact checkers” have access to the same information that the people auditing the Arizona election results studied, counted, checked, recounted, rechecked, etc., THEY HAVE NO FUCKING CLUE WHAT THE FACTS ARE.
I find the whole notion of “fact checking” an issue that remains FACTUALLY UNRESOLVED to be moronically ludicrous. And I say “factually unresolved “ in the most generous of spirits.
Clearly, many intelligent elected representatives heard from their constituents and voted to study what happened. It’s like “fact checking” whether OJ killed Nicole IN THE MIDDLE OF THE FREAKING TRIAL.
Why doesn’t someone point out the simple truth: unless “fact checkers” have access to the same information that the people auditing the Arizona election results studied, counted, checked, recounted, rechecked, etc., THEY HAVE NO FUCKING CLUE WHAT THE FACTS ARE.
I find the whole notion of “fact checking” an issue that remains FACTUALLY UNRESOLVED to be moronically ludicrous. And I say “factually unresolved “ in the most generous of spirits.
Clearly, many intelligent elected representatives heard from their constituents and voted to study what happened. It’s like “fact checking” whether OJ killed Nicole IN THE MIDDLE OF THE FREAKING TRIAL.
Ok, that is all.