Thank you - you make a really good point. I, like most on this board, am seen as a nut case for refusing the shots and for claiming that there is a global cabal and there is evil in this world that we MUST confront and fight. I think your approach (by volume vs single authoritarian figure) is likely the better approach. Now I just have to memorize and keep it all straight ;-)
I agree with your original stance, no credible sources then assume it's fake. While, yeah, you can see if current figureheads have said similar things, that's not a good reason to ignore the fact that this quote might be fake. Kind of like RatherGate when Dan Rather said something like "even if the document is a fake, can you address the claims in it?".
Thank you - you make a really good point. I, like most on this board, am seen as a nut case for refusing the shots and for claiming that there is a global cabal and there is evil in this world that we MUST confront and fight. I think your approach (by volume vs single authoritarian figure) is likely the better approach. Now I just have to memorize and keep it all straight ;-)
I agree with your original stance, no credible sources then assume it's fake. While, yeah, you can see if current figureheads have said similar things, that's not a good reason to ignore the fact that this quote might be fake. Kind of like RatherGate when Dan Rather said something like "even if the document is a fake, can you address the claims in it?".