I'm curious what legislation Trump is referring to which would fix the birthright citizenship issue that wouldn't be held up in the courts claiming it's unconstitutional?
I love Thomas' line:
... Men and boys with gender dysphoria are not women or girls, even if they believe that they are.
Do you have anything to back up your claim that it might be possible? My guess is no. If you do happen to find someone that can time travel please give me their contact info because I'd like to know what stocks to invest in.
Does it mimic human intelligence? Yes
I would say no to that one. We don't even understand human intelligence, or even animal intelligence and computers, ie silicon gates and software, will never even approach anything intelligent. It's all hype, or mostly hype, as the Gartner Hype Cycle suggests. Yes, they've made strides in tokenizing language so that it somewhat understands what we're asking and can do an decent job in answering some types of questions, but that's it.
Thanks. I guess we might agree then, that there is no such thing as AI.
He's not. No such thing as time traveler.
He is perfect and I do agree with everything he does.
Trump is the best. He has no problem ripping people apart, as he should, right in front of them.
I guess il Donaldo Trumpo is in Paris. :)
Yes, they know, but I'm sure don't like to admit it. Also, seems the meeting was waiting for him to arrive. I guess the BOSS arrives last.
I love that he talks like this publicly.
That's a good one.
In the SpaceX IPO Elon mentioned data centers in space which would use the sun to power the data center and I guess heat wouldn't be an issue in space. However, I'm wondering how much they'd have to pay the people maintaining the data centers in space. While you can envision all the software upgrades/fixes could be done from earth, I'm guessing it's unlikely robotics could do all the hardware maintenance.
Is the water consumed or just used and returned?
Sounds like hollywood stuff. I doubt any of this is true. As BasedInFact suggested, we can just ignore the old system, no need to follow any ceremonies the old system had.
because, of course, machine learning from training data is what transforms plain old software into AI (plus a few other ingredients)
There's still no intelligence. It's just the same software using statistics from previous results. There still is no thinking on the part of the software. It's still just running a program.
We'll have to agree to disagree. There is no such thing as Artificial Intelligence. It's just a new buzz word for neural nets 2.0 as neural nets really didn't take off.
Here's an example, and it's actually something that really happened a few months back. My granddaughter was over and I told here there were some cookies on the table and she could have some. I could tell by the way she was looking at the package, they happen to be Tate's cookies, she wasn't familiar with the opening/closing mechanism. I watched as she looked at the package for a few seconds and she then opened the tabs and unrolled the top so she could get at the cookies. She was six years old at the time. The only way a computer could figure this out is if the programmer programmed this problem/solution. As I said, computers are dumb, and they always will be.
Thanks!
Does someone have a link to this Trump truth?
I agree that it depends on the definition of "intelligence". Seems like a hard word to define correctly/completely and I'm certainly not going to take a stab at it. However, my guess is that no reasonable definition would have the computer coming out ahead of the human in any "intelligent" task. As I said, computers can certainly compute faster, but I'm going to guess that a good definition of "intelligence" doesn't depend on how fast something is completed.
By definition, humans are not as smart as superintelligent AI.
Not sure what this means. Computers, ie. silicon chips and programs, are dumb. Way dumber than humans. They can certainly compute things faster, but that doesn't make them smarter.
Computers aren't intelligent and never will be.
Has anyone verified this graphic above from some congressional documentation? I did a quick search and didn't find anything.