In the SpaceX IPO Elon mentioned data centers in space which would use the sun to power the data center and I guess heat wouldn't be an issue in space. However, I'm wondering how much they'd have to pay the people maintaining the data centers in space. While you can envision all the software upgrades/fixes could be done from earth, I'm guessing it's unlikely robotics could do all the hardware maintenance.

Is the water consumed or just used and returned?

Sounds like hollywood stuff. I doubt any of this is true. As BasedInFact suggested, we can just ignore the old system, no need to follow any ceremonies the old system had.

because, of course, machine learning from training data is what transforms plain old software into AI (plus a few other ingredients)

There's still no intelligence. It's just the same software using statistics from previous results. There still is no thinking on the part of the software. It's still just running a program.

We'll have to agree to disagree. There is no such thing as Artificial Intelligence. It's just a new buzz word for neural nets 2.0 as neural nets really didn't take off.

Here's an example, and it's actually something that really happened a few months back. My granddaughter was over and I told here there were some cookies on the table and she could have some. I could tell by the way she was looking at the package, they happen to be Tate's cookies, she wasn't familiar with the opening/closing mechanism. I watched as she looked at the package for a few seconds and she then opened the tabs and unrolled the top so she could get at the cookies. She was six years old at the time. The only way a computer could figure this out is if the programmer programmed this problem/solution. As I said, computers are dumb, and they always will be.

Thanks!

Does someone have a link to this Trump truth?

I agree that it depends on the definition of "intelligence". Seems like a hard word to define correctly/completely and I'm certainly not going to take a stab at it. However, my guess is that no reasonable definition would have the computer coming out ahead of the human in any "intelligent" task. As I said, computers can certainly compute faster, but I'm going to guess that a good definition of "intelligence" doesn't depend on how fast something is completed.

By definition, humans are not as smart as superintelligent AI.

Not sure what this means. Computers, ie. silicon chips and programs, are dumb. Way dumber than humans. They can certainly compute things faster, but that doesn't make them smarter.

Computers aren't intelligent and never will be.

Looks a bit like the F-47, at least from some video I saw about the F-47 first look:

https://www.facebook.com/100089701716225/videos/the-f-47-vader-makes-its-first-public-appearance-this-is-americas-newest-stealth/1407672440852841/

This looks fake.

Tell us what you really think? :)

Not getting the argument behind the truth social video. I'm pretty sure an article I read a while back mentioned that ethanol has less energy than gasoline so you're expected to get less miles per gallon out of it.

Or use that sonic weapon.

Does anyone have the Trump Truth post of the image above? All I could find is a Trump Truth repost of the image of Obummer with the pallet of cache:

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116635914092231106

I couldn't find the phone calls post.

I was happy to hear the department of energy head mention hydrocarbons, and didn't once mention fossil fuels.

public and private entities are withdrawing from or reducing their climate commitments and reembracing fossil fuels.

I remember reading somewhere that the correct term is hydrocarbons as petroleum does not come from fossils. Additionally, petroleum is renewable, as the process which creates it continues happening. I haven't really looked into it that much, but sounds reasonable.

Trump is a stable genius. My view is that he knows what he's doing.

Is that one clip of audio the only thing this twitter post is going off of to assume SCOTUS will actually make such a ruling?

I assume liposomal vitamin C is an ok form of vitamin C to use?

Not sure I get the point you're trying to get across. Seems much of the latest JD Vance fraud is based on Nick Shirley's reporting. I'd still like to see DOGE working on finding all the fraud in the US government.

Yeah, redtoe-skipper is correct, that was from quite a while ago. Not sure why revolver just posted this out and whoever is the person who tweeted it recently. Maybe they've been in a coma for months.

Yeah, I was going to reply with the same. That was quite a while ago.

These tears need to be repaired, so the liver sends cholesterol to the torn area to act like "spackle" in dry wall -- to fill in the tear. If this process happens continually over many years (due to eating a lot of sugar), this cholesterol "spackle" can build up and eventually break off causing a blood clot, leading to heart attack and stroke.

I've heard this before. And while I haven't done any investigation myself as to the validity of this claim, I neither believe it or disbelieve it at this point. However, it does raise some questions, at least for me.

1. If this is the case then it would seem like a bad idea to remove this "spackling", at least until the blood vessel has repaired itself.

2. Why wouldn't this work like a scab on an external flesh wound where the scab eventually falls off and the wound is healed, or healed enough not to need a covering.

3. I remember reading someone posting about carbon build up on a gun and mentioning that gun cleaning was unnecessary because the carbon build up is self limiting. Could the same thing be true for the cholesterol "spackling"?

4. Would the assumption be that the higher percentage of deaths in the non saturated fat group was due to heart issues due to these non-repaired tears in the blood vessels?

5. There's a guy who has posted on this site about clearing out the cholesterol in his father-in-law's arteries using Lysine and Vitamin C, I guess from some research that Dr. Pauling has done in the past. But maybe the cholesterol should not be removed, unless it gets removed naturally by the body like a scab.