Now this, Frens, is a serious CONUNDRUM!!🤔😂🤣
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
lol...
Aside from the first and second hand eyewitness accounts, there are multiple external references to Jesus outside of the four Gospel accounts.
You, my friend, are in conflict with many well known, Atheist Historians who conclude the opposite.
You're argument is tantamount to saying "Aside from your eyewitnesses, you have no eyewitnesses!"
Air tight logic there.
By the way. it's a religious book that is the main reference for many Archeologists and Historians.
Don't be a Jesus Mythicist!
No, there's no evidence Jesus ever existed.
That wasn't a dark time in history either. It was very well recorded in the secular history books... No mention of a guy doing magic, except by Josephus and that accounts is shady at best.
Saying there is no evidence for Jesus is like saying there is no evidence for election fraud!
Exactly!!!
Says the religious guy that believes in Jesus.
The Fallacy of Guilt by Association:
The fallacy of trying to refute or condemn someone's standpoint, arguments or actions by evoking the negative ethos of those with whom the speaker is identified or of a group, party, religion or race to which he or she belongs or was once associated with. A form of Ad Hominem Argument, e.g., "Don't listen to her. She's a Republican so you can't trust anything she says,"
A Jesus Mythicist. The worst kind.
History denier.
Probably the most well attested historical figure from the first century. But no matter. You keep your Pastafarian beliefs close to your heart. We've been in verbal circles on this platform before. We can meet back to back in the streets defending freedom. Then we can sit down and hash out the small stuff.
Everyone has motives to write words on paper... Truth is hardly the primary motive.
If words on paper is enough evidence to you, that works for you. It's not, for me.
I'm content not believing anything written by very fallible men thousands of years ago. Apparently, to most, that's proof. Words on paper isn't proof. You're trusting complete strangers motives. For that reason I'm really incompatible with the Christian faith. But it's all good.
And as you mention, I'm here as a patriot to to collaborate and defend this country and our freedoms...
You, unfortunately, have a very precursory understanding of how ancient literature is verified, and how bibliographic evidence is compiled.
So no God either? I suggest Pascal's wager.
Anything's possible.