Now this, Frens, is a serious CONUNDRUM!!🤔😂🤣
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
No one said Tacitus was an "eyewitness."
Having a secular source mention Jesus (among others) only 20+ years after Jesus lived is enormous when discussing literature from early antiquity.
It's not hearsay - it's history.
And isn't evidence Jesus existed.
Be patient. It’s coming. Fast👍
Maranatha!!!!
Surely He is!!!🙏🥰
What would count as evidence for you? What's your standard of historical validation form the 1st century??
You understand that lies can be written in books and then repeated as if they're fact for centuries, right?
Words on paper aren't evidence of anything due to that. There will always be room for skepticism with that format... Always.
NOOOOoooooo I didn't understand that until now? <sarcasm>
What WOULD count as evidence for you?
Let's see if you have a reasonable evidential standard to even judge historical veracity from the 1st century...