It makes more sense to call them what they are, by what they do, than to classify someone who is attracted to a lascivious 17-year old (but comports himself appropriately) in the same category as someone who actually diddles a toddler. There's a difference there, one probably worth noting.
I guess they're not abusing children if they don't look at porn or abduct or lure kids.
But that's really the hill they want to die on?
Really?
Not a very stable or admirable hill.
It makes more sense to call them what they are, by what they do, than to classify someone who is attracted to a lascivious 17-year old (but comports himself appropriately) in the same category as someone who actually diddles a toddler. There's a difference there, one probably worth noting.