Fact or myth?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
The idea that virus particles are communicated Airborne via aerosols is a widely held belief.
However, there may be other pathways, which are more difficult to proof, yet there are examples of it:
But how does that work?
Basically, it would require to look at human beings in a meeting with one another as partakers of a co-created energy field, where each one is capable of influencing to differing degrees another.
Since this idea is totally preposterous, the easier explanation is aerosols.
Why? Because it is based on a apriory assumed idea viruses to be a natural disease cause. Yet that has not been demonstrated.
How about lab created viruses? Gain of function specifically eyes higher virulence in the first place , and second lethality, by combining strains of RNA together, interspersed with artificially created strains. Put together in one box andere voila! A novel virus.
Narrative leads to push for proof. Provided proof fits the narrative.
You would have to untie this mixup first.
Interesting, thanks.