Pretty sure that would literally be against the Gen eva convention if it came to that. Ability to purchase food is a human right. Not everybody owns land to grow their own food. If it even so much as encroaches on transportation, it's up to our best lawfags to present the case for our rural frens who rely on transportation to even make purchases. The jab is experi mental. If you take out somebody's ability to buy food, that is no longer coercion. That is forcing tyrannical edict upon the people to take the jab, which the convention strictly outlines under C H E M l C A L wpns.
“If you take out somebody's ability to buy food, that is no longer coercion. That is forcing tyrannical edict”
That’s what coercion is, force. It’s force, violence, or threat of force or violence eg ‘Give me a third of your income or armed goons will crank back your rotator cuffs and throw you in a cage.’ Coercion is very serious. Some people misuse the word to mean things like social pressure.
Pretty sure that would literally be against the Gen eva convention if it came to that. Ability to purchase food is a human right. Not everybody owns land to grow their own food. If it even so much as encroaches on transportation, it's up to our best lawfags to present the case for our rural frens who rely on transportation to even make purchases. The jab is experi mental. If you take out somebody's ability to buy food, that is no longer coercion. That is forcing tyrannical edict upon the people to take the jab, which the convention strictly outlines under C H E M l C A L wpns.
“If you take out somebody's ability to buy food, that is no longer coercion. That is forcing tyrannical edict”
That’s what coercion is, force. It’s force, violence, or threat of force or violence eg ‘Give me a third of your income or armed goons will crank back your rotator cuffs and throw you in a cage.’ Coercion is very serious. Some people misuse the word to mean things like social pressure.
Fair point. I always thought coerce was a limp way of saying force.