Some of the stuff he’s saying lately sure makes it seem like he’s an actor working for the white hats. He’s exposing stuff that you would think his handlers would rather he not bring up. The MSM deliberately doesn’t address trafficking or mention anything about the kids. The question was about defunding the police. Why would he deflect from that by bringing up something even more controversial - unless his intent is to try to lump it all in together as “conspiracy theory”. Problem is, we already know defunding the police happened - it was being pushed on many levels. It is definitely not a conspiracy theory. So why counter it by bringing up the one thing that has the potential to redpill the masses?
Some of the stuff he’s saying lately sure makes it seem like he’s an actor working for the white hats. He’s exposing stuff that you would think his handlers would rather he not bring up. The MSM deliberately doesn’t address trafficking or mention anything about the kids. The question was about defunding the police. Why would he deflect from that by bringing up something even more controversial - unless his intent is to try to lump it all in together as “conspiracy theory”. Problem is, we already know defunding the police happened - it was being pushed on many levels. It is definitely not a conspiracy theory. So why counter it by bringing up the one thing that has the potential to redpill the masses?