Funny...Very funny actually. I did not claim expert status. I was telling people: If they simply took the time to READ my prior posts, they would know I'm not a shill.
I say this in all charity: It's Time to wake up and discern who's who or you will remain hopelessly confused.
You are amongst experts here. You made a big mistake. The SCOTUS is an original Jurisdiction court under Art III and only takes cases on discretionary appealate review usually years after the case goes through the lower courts. Kennedy would have no standing. You promulgated false information, an apology is the least we could expect.
In order to achieve worldwide awakening, it requires those who are cognizant of the GODLY work that must be done. Charity is essential and one can correct others properly and improperly. Sadly, you chose the latter. If you're as wise as you believe, you will learn from this missive.
It wasn't SCOTUS but, it is a valid legal suit submitted to Ontario's Superior Court which is their highest court:
vaccinechoicecanada.com/tag/rocco-galati/
Of course, I am sorry and I have stated in this thread that I will look for better substantiated primary and secondary sources prior to posting again. Feel free to remove this erroneous post.
Think what you want but, you'd be absolutely wrong. Do your research before accusing people. I'm on many blogs and my position speaks for itself.
Funny...Very funny actually. I did not claim expert status. I was telling people: If they simply took the time to READ my prior posts, they would know I'm not a shill.
I say this in all charity: It's Time to wake up and discern who's who or you will remain hopelessly confused.
You are amongst experts here. You made a big mistake. The SCOTUS is an original Jurisdiction court under Art III and only takes cases on discretionary appealate review usually years after the case goes through the lower courts. Kennedy would have no standing. You promulgated false information, an apology is the least we could expect.
In order to achieve worldwide awakening, it requires those who are cognizant of the GODLY work that must be done. Charity is essential and one can correct others properly and improperly. Sadly, you chose the latter. If you're as wise as you believe, you will learn from this missive.
This is my final post to you.
It wasn't SCOTUS but, it is a valid legal suit submitted to Ontario's Superior Court which is their highest court:
vaccinechoicecanada.com/tag/rocco-galati/
Of course, I am sorry and I have stated in this thread that I will look for better substantiated primary and secondary sources prior to posting again. Feel free to remove this erroneous post.