For context, she’s a 63 year old nurse. We got into it because she keeps pushing me to get the vaccine. I keep telling her that I am never getting it, and I have thoroughly read and studied for months in support of my decision. So she asks me to send her my sources. I spent an hour last night re-reading journal articles and mainstream news source articles that link back to university and governmental studies. Sources such as the NIH, CDC, etc. I then placed them in a specific order so that they supported each other and my brief, educated assertions typed above the links.
Her response after all of that effort, effort that would’ve gotten me an A in any college course? “These aren’t .gov or .edu sources” “I’m concerned that you only read sources you agree with”
Mother of GOD, these people are DENSE. THE GOVERNMENT AND UNIVERSITIES ARE THE PROBLEM. THEY’RE SKEWING THE DATA. THE SOURCES FORMED MY OPINION, not the other way around. There’s no convincing them otherwise. Sorry for the yelling, this is just insane. She also brushed off the lockdowns and vaccine passports like they’re nothing to worry about and people protesting are just prolonging the pandemic 🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️
As requested, my sources and synopsis in an easy to access location.
PCR test deemed ineffective for the purpose of diagnosing cases of Covid. This is a Class I recall and revocation of the Emergency Use Authorization for the PCR technology as a diagnostic tool in this instance.
Confronting the myth of unvaccinated people driving the formation of variants.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaccinated-covid-mutations-immune-response/
EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) for vaccines is only allowed in the absence of viable treatments. The effectiveness of Ivermectin has been suppressed, thus, the EUA for the Covid vaccines is ILLEGAL according to the government’s own standards. Why is this allowed?
https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-021-06104-9
As for chloroquine (of which the much-maligned Hydroxychloroquine is a milder derivative) it was deemed to be a potent SARS inhibitor by none other than Dr. Fauci’s NIH. Note that in the Children’s Health Defense article, those recovered from SARS (80% similar to C19) demonstrated immunity 17 years later to SARS-CoV-2. It follows that Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine are effective treatments for Covid due to its similarities to SARS. This takes us right back to the illegal EUA for the vaccines, and the countless lives lost in pursuit of it.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/
Those in the placebo group will still be granted a vaccine passport in the UK...this makes no sense.
Is the disease worse than the “jab”? The CDC is NOT gathering consistent data on hospitalizations for vaccine-related health events. Why not? What are they hiding?
https://aapsonline.org/covid-19-is-the-disease-worse-than-the-jab/
Doctors across the world have been pushing the vaccine on their pregnant patients for months and declaring it safe, yet Moderna is JUST starting trials on pregnant women?! There is NO data definitively declaring this safe for expectant mothers and their babies. THAT is the ethical violation I referenced. These are experimental vaccines and therefore informed consent is paramount so that those in receipt of them know the risks of consenting.
This Twitter thread with graphed data from government sources supporting the author’s assertions. Mostly or completely vaxxed populations are experiencing a high number of cases, while countries with a lower overall vax percentage have remained largely unchanged.
Thread by @holmenkollin on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App
All viral illnesses can have negative impacts on pregnancy. There is really nothing that can be done to prevent this beyond working to maintain a strong immune system. I could get the Covid vaccine, sure, but end up with viral meningitis or the flu—life is full of risk, illness, and danger, and Covid is just one of millions of viruses that can infect vertebrates. I am not compounding that risk by taking an experimental vaccine, with NO idea what the long term effects on my body or the bodies of my future children will be. I would much rather take my chances with what is known.
https://www.jci.org/articles/view/87490
As for your position as a BSN—I respect that deeply. However, a medical professional that is using coercive measures to get a patient to consent to an experimental substance entering their body is against everything the field should stand for.
“Be not afraid” —St. John Paul the Great
Rather than wage battle over duelling sources, I would lay out an argument based on scientific principles and the process of reason.
In no particular order, and of varying narrative potency:
• The trials are not over until 2023. Esp. if you are not at high risk, what's the reason not to wait and see what the outcome is?
• Does she know that, during the very brief pre-trials, most of the placebo group ended up being given the vaccine before the end of the trial? That's completely abnormal, and puts into question the overall results (if they were interested in results, which they were not...)
• Why are they encouraging (in some places) people to arbitrarily "mix and match" vaccine doses from different purveyors? This is also highly irregular, and unscientific given that a trial is still under way.
• Why are they saying it's "safe and effective" for pregnant women and children, when pregnant women and children were not part of the brief pre-trials? This is unscientific.
• Why is the UK saying that people who received placebos in the pre-trials now count as having been vaccinated? This is beyond unscientific into the absurd.
You can get into things like.. why are they letting in tens of thousands of illegals both in the US and Europe without testing, while citizens can't even board a bus without a test? Not serious or scientific,
• Why did the CDC openly declare that so-called vaxxed people should have their Covid PCR tests run at fewer cycles than people whose DNA hasn't yet been modified? Again, un-serious and un-scientific.
I could probably come up with another half-dozen, but these are just off the top of my head. Anyone who has had a science background should see these anomalies as glaring red flags that Something Is Not Right.
• oh yeah... No "drug" in history has had as complex a biological interaction as this, and it is completely uncharted territory... Yet it is the substance we are being ordered to assume into our bodies with the least safety testing of any drug, EVER.. for a disease that is among the least lethal EVER. This makes ZERO sense if one does not wish to impute nefarious motives.
If your aunt can come up with a logical answer to even one of these questions, I would be surprised, but any one of them being unanswerable gives the entire game away as bogus.
With all your research you've probably come across your own red flags to add to this list. Good luck!!
P.S. The new FDA ruling that the PCR test is not fit for purpose means that the gravity of the situation has been greatly over-estimated (we knew this, but this is proof).
P.P.S. (another pede reported) "As of May 7 2021: Cdc stops reporting Breakthrough cases unless they cause hospitalization or death:" https://archive.ph/Wz2hu You just stop testing what you don't want to know about? How can that be explained as scientific?