Of note is the fact that the Clinton legal team twice referred to the submitted evidence as being contained on a “CD”, while the FBI repeatedly contradicts on two separate documents this claim (on page 35 and 37) by instead referring to the disc as a DVD. The distinction is significant as CDs are outdated and obsolete technology previously used to copy pictures or audio, while DVDs are known for storing video, given their far greater storage capability. Relatedly, one type of CD called “VCD” (Video Compact Disc) is a relatively advanced type of CD that can contain video and audio. Consequently, the cryptic FBI message about “size limitations” might then indicate the contents were in fact on a CD though were of such great size that a copy was made on a DVD, implying the evidence is video footage. Regardless, the documents confirm beyond any doubt that copious amounts of high quality evidence pertaining to the federal investigation into Seth Rich was voluntarily submitted in total secrecy by Hillary Clinton and the DNC to the FBI.

tl;dr : Clintons/DNC said they gave up a CD, FBI said it was a DVD, DVDs are bigger than CDs and that's important info nobody knows, apparently, and not just somebody saying CD out of convenience/habit...

Okay, so was this article written by a boomer or a zoomer?